According to the scientific method, a scientist isn't supposed to start out with preconceived notions and then grasp for any evidence that might back up his/her conclusions. Instead, if he/she has a hypothesis, he/she is supposed to test it. If the tests confirm that there's something to the hypothesis, the hypothesis becomes either a theory or a law.
Doesn't it seem to you that the Intelligent Design proponents have started off with a Creationist world view, and they have been grasping for whatever evidence might back up their claims?
2006-10-26
05:50:22
·
9 answers
·
asked by
tangerine
7