It dawned on me that the big bang has a bit of magic thrown in for good measure, whereby space itself inexplicably expanded faster than the spead of light for a while and then stopped expanding.
But what if it didn't? What if the reason for red shift is not because galaxies are moving away from eachother within space, but is due instead to the ever present expansion of space? What if space expands at a greater and greater rate relative to distance from an observer? From our perspective, distant galaxies would appear to be accelerating away from us (which we observe), there would be an event horizon of sort where the rate of expansion exceeds the speed of light so that the amount of background light would be limited (which we observe).
For this to really make sense, there would have to be a mechanism by which energy/matter is created by such an expansion at some probabilistic rate.
Putting it all together, is this a plausible steady state alternative to the big bang?
2006-08-31
03:08:52
·
9 answers
·
asked by
lenny
7