English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Astronomy & Space - July 2006

[Selected]: All categories Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

How is this compare to the Big Bang?
Are there similar thories like this?

The universe is endless but a lot less dense then what we see.

Gravity create dense places in the universe that creates the galaxies we see.

The redshift is from the affect of gravity on space (bending the space that streach tje distences) and/or the higher densety of matter and energy make light travel slower (like it travel slower in air).

The background radiation is from the "outer" universe and/or the process of matter and energy entering from the "outer" universe.

In the end we will get most (or all) matter in a black hole that will return its energy by Hawkigns radiation and the process will created again someplace else.

2006-07-08 23:05:12 · 5 answers · asked by gelrad 2

by the same token if we are able to collapse space we can get back the energy. for ex if we were able to collapse a cubic cm of space, we would obtain enough energy to boil off all the oceans of this earth.

2006-07-08 22:16:51 · 9 answers · asked by savvy s 2

2006-07-08 22:10:05 · 16 answers · asked by lucky_1 1

2006-07-08 21:53:16 · 18 answers · asked by Nadigo G 1

2006-07-08 21:17:36 · 16 answers · asked by jags 1

Is it possible that Mars once orbited the sun at the distance the Earth now orbits. Will the Earth someday move out to Mars current orbit. That would mean Venus would someday cool off and
possibly move to Earths orbit and become Earthlike. In other words are the planets receeding from the Sun?

2006-07-08 21:08:32 · 7 answers · asked by boob 2

2006-07-08 21:05:43 · 10 answers · asked by Dev 1

I've heard a lot about this on a number of different sites and i was just wondering if i'm the only person who even remotely believes this. I mean i think we pretty much know that there is something out there, anyone have any mature input?

2006-07-08 20:41:23 · 8 answers · asked by grannypincher8 2

2006-07-08 20:41:00 · 2 answers · asked by samilsoft 1

2006-07-08 20:28:52 · 7 answers · asked by sm r 1

Is saying we can never travel faster than the speed of light the same as saying we would never go faster than sound? Seems to me that this is a barrier that exists for the sole purpose of existing and until someone disproves Einstein it will continue to exist.

2006-07-08 19:14:59 · 22 answers · asked by Michael 3

if there is a star everywhere,then why in the space not bright with the light as well as the heat of the stars.what happens to all the energy emitted from the stars.it can't be lost because energy is niether produced not destroyed.

so my question is-
why is the universe not bright?
why is the universe so cold?
where does the energy of heat and light go?

2006-07-08 18:15:46 · 17 answers · asked by ♀guardian of angels♀ 3

And do they believe humanity will have inhabited another planet by then??

2006-07-08 18:12:24 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

What will we theoretically find if we can go inside a black hole? Do the objects get destroyed or there is a seperate world there?

2006-07-08 18:00:56 · 23 answers · asked by Ankur 2

The limit of the universe could be defined as 10 to 20 billion light years away, the distance light has travelled since the universe started. We can observe millions of stars and galaxies when we look into the sky towards our perceived limit of the universe.

If we were able to reduce this distance (same scale) the opposite way, getting smaller and smaller towards zero and then look into the new sky, what would we observe in this quantum world. Would we even be aware that stars and galaxies exist?

2006-07-08 17:54:21 · 4 answers · asked by Brenda's World 4

Deep space would be outside our solar system and I also want to know once the rip happened what would be inside the rip.

2006-07-08 17:13:43 · 4 answers · asked by abriteone 1

2006-07-08 16:56:35 · 18 answers · asked by eventhorizon 2

I see ton of sci-fi books with ideas on this yet why have we not tried to biuld on? Or for that matter why did we stop going to the moon instead of build ing up form ther the means to make said space craft? I hear money is the big reson why. But I dont belive that as we spend so much on other useless projects and such. That I would think space craft and their support bases would lead to jobs and new area to live.

2006-07-08 16:43:29 · 11 answers · asked by shadowwalkeroflight 1

Now I do. It was eye opening and quite reveling. Check it out for yourself at: www.delusionresistance.org

2006-07-08 16:12:23 · 3 answers · asked by bladei 2

2006-07-08 15:53:44 · 14 answers · asked by pearljam_80 1

Ex. Stanford Taurus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_colonization

2006-07-08 15:51:39 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-08 15:42:53 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers