English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 14 September 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

Now we find they are falsifying the IAEA report on IRANian nuclear weapons development.

Remember they doctored the Iraqi intelligence report as well.
source: letter from IAEA.

How can any sane person not see this is a corrupt government?

2006-09-14 13:05:10 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

'Project For a New American Century' whose members include Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz, and when was it first made public that they advocated the removal of Saddam Hussein in the early 90s?

2006-09-14 13:02:14 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-14 13:01:42 · 5 answers · asked by victor g 1

Quote:What is the difference between a Liberal and a bucket of poo?
Reason:Insulting Other Participants

And yet there is no direct insult made, for all we know, it could've been pointed completely the other way.

Did YOU report this? if so, make a direct quote from the Yahoo! rules in where this is in violation.

2006-09-14 12:58:22 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Or just follow in with the rest of the sheep who bash him?.Really don't understand this.I catch his show 2 or 3 times a week , and everytime I see it he has some kind of Liberal or Democrat strategist or talk show host, or arthur, etc, on.He allows these people to talk and express their veiws, then debates it, and sometimes even AGREES with them! He has been critcal of Bush at times as well. Maybe they just hate him because he's one of the few who actualy brings up the other side of things? I really dont think most on here have ever seen him..

2006-09-14 12:55:37 · 18 answers · asked by itsallover 5

Have been following the situation between us (the US) and Iran for over a year ... and have known that we were talking chit ... do I think Iran sponsors terrorist (undecided ... but don't think they would if they really knew their plans), do I think that they are seriously looking for the economic value of nuclear energy ... yes, why should we, as a nation dictate or even try to dictate which countries can develope nuclear energey for just that ... energy purposes. I don't side with Iran on its political views, but I do side with them for their right to develope their country as they see fit. We are not the police of the world, nor do we have the right to be. I am a Republican ... but am very tired of what the people that I helped put in office have done to the country that I served for 15 years ... why I am going to vote for a Democrat or anyone else this year that I feel is better than what is there. just my view ... what is yours?

2006-09-14 12:55:29 · 5 answers · asked by Zenas Walter 3

Never happened during Clinton era, wonder why?

2006-09-14 12:47:23 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-14 12:45:35 · 15 answers · asked by Kelly 1

2006-09-14 12:44:31 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-14 12:43:29 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I was wondering what makes Ruth Kelly so suitable for the position of Minister for Equality? The position includes dominance over gay rights. She's a hardcare Catholic (possibly a member of Opus Dei - her brother definitely is) and she has abstained from voting on gay rights issues during her career. She once voted against a bill to allow gay couples to adopt too.

OBVISOULY SHE'S IN THE WRONG POSITION! Would you agree that she only has this position because Blair had to move her because everybody hated her education policies?

2006-09-14 12:30:56 · 8 answers · asked by quierounvaquero 4

Do the Republicans stand for anything else?

2006-09-14 12:28:06 · 24 answers · asked by Villain 6

If so, state why!

2006-09-14 12:27:57 · 9 answers · asked by loserkid 1

in my oppinion representational democracy is not a true democracy, i believe we wouldnt have attacked iraq if we were living in a true democracy as everyone i spoke to was against it and regardless of public oppinon blair went with bush.

2006-09-14 12:25:21 · 10 answers · asked by BERNON W 3

And, if you want to answer; what are the top five things he did to improve the United States?

I understand this can be an opinion, but I'm interested to know how others feel.

2006-09-14 12:15:49 · 11 answers · asked by SafiMoyo 2

no more slants or spins to express the views of any political party but the cold hard facts on event of national intrests and security so that the people can see the state of their government for themselves

2006-09-14 12:13:20 · 5 answers · asked by matthew_yelle 2

SOMETHING IS NOT ADDING UP IN THE NEOCONS FUZZY MATH.

2006-09-14 12:09:47 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.asp?Feed=OBR&Date=20060625&ID=5821739
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/irqindx.htm

2.5 million barrels a day and rising. Why do some people believe we are not taking the oil? Where do they get their information?

2006-09-14 12:04:24 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

I ask,because liberals would be the first to die in muslim controled world,due to the fact that they would,not want to deal with liberal whining,which,will than allow the rest of us to rise and take back our world with out,the liberals interfearing,with their whinning in this knock out,drag out fight that will be necessary to defeat these muslims.

2006-09-14 11:51:49 · 9 answers · asked by truckman 4

2006-09-14 11:50:21 · 19 answers · asked by Roger 1

My similar question to the Canadians was thrown out. I asked about bears and seal pups being killed seems it is more important to not upset our Canadian friends than help defenceless animals.

2006-09-14 11:41:14 · 35 answers · asked by deadly 4

And also what should be the role of U.S. in dealing with those issues?

Please don't spam, i'm serious, it's a survey for my polical class in college. Just tell me what you think, not need to be in a political manner. Thanks.

2006-09-14 11:38:24 · 19 answers · asked by ice_mp9 1

im looking for peoples views on this, i personally think the leaders of both states should face charges and that the way they have treated their brave soldiers is dispicable. Will the power of the average individual prevail and hold such characters as Mr Bush & Blair in contempt of their actions!!!!!

I personally would send both to the gallows.....they dont care about the welfare of their own people but only that of personal gain.

2006-09-14 11:32:35 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous

a. Possible terrorist attacks
b. Global Warming
c. The Dems facists appeasers
d. The Cons are facists

2006-09-14 11:31:01 · 8 answers · asked by MEL T 7

I feel the evidence to go to the war was shaky at best, and later shown to be fraudulent, but that has little to do with my question:

In a situation where the dictator of a country is required, after attempting to invade a neighbooring country, to have his arsenal inspected and after a while he refuses and kicks out the inspectors...what is the proper course of action?

2006-09-14 11:15:18 · 11 answers · asked by DougDoug_ 6

Just as a refresher here it is:

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

It seems that by imposing his religion on the rest of us Bush is in violation of the first amendment which guarantees the freedom of religion. Ironically he hates Muslim countries because they are run by a religion different than his own, but he does much the same thing by pushing for religion as law.

If you look back through history you will notice that empires that turn to religion as law fail miserably, as we are failing now.

I am not anti-religion; I am pro constitution and pro freedom. Your thoughts????

2006-09-14 11:11:47 · 20 answers · asked by 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers