do not bother to explain technical details, i've been reading up on them since 3 years back.
law of the excluded middle, false dilemna, syllogism.
how would it seriously benefit human beings to study these theories ? granted, false dilemna makes sense in arguement, so does syllogism. but whats the point of making them so similar, and the most questionable(i think) law, law of the excluded middle. like, huh, you need someone to tell you that?
at least theories like Pythagoras' theorm does benefit us, i really cannot picture someone spending weeks on a thesis explaining that if a = b, and b != c, then a != c.
2007-06-09
05:12:24
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Philosophy