Economics - November 2006

2006-11-01 18:48:30 · 7 answers · asked by VW1993 1

Does it end up in the hands of the Chancellor of the Exchequer or does it get invested in a more worthwhile cause?

2006-11-01 18:45:57 · 4 answers · asked by Part Time Cynic 7

I cant really find an answer does anybody have any ideas

2006-11-01 17:25:57 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Year? Month?

2006-11-01 17:20:55 · 7 answers · asked by a_fallenangel_a 2

How does the whole currency system work? Is new money made to compensate for the money that is now overseas? Does China just give it back, or do they eventually just own the USA? I am having a bit of trouble trying to understand how that whole process is supossed to work.

2006-11-01 17:14:55 · 6 answers · asked by samon 1

How does the whole currency system work? Is new money made to compensate for the money that is now overseas? Does China just give it back, or do they eventually just own the USA? I am having a bit of trouble trying to understand how that whole process is supossed to work.

2006-11-01 17:14:07 · 3 answers · asked by samon 1

2006-11-01 16:41:30 · 5 answers · asked by saremock 1

this is for a class and the definition states Russia and China are perfect examples of a "command economy".

2006-11-01 16:22:45 · 4 answers · asked by Eva W 1

My son has a project on above in school. he is in std.vii .pl.answer the question to his standard . thanks

2006-11-01 15:31:35 · 5 answers · asked by raju l 1

Australia ECONOMIC FUTURE WILL BE DETERMINED MORE BY THE IDEAS OF MARX, SMITH OR MAYNARD KEYNES, AND WHY.

Please list websites too if possible thanks

2006-11-01 15:00:15 · 1 answers · asked by shy pie 2

b. what is the rate of inflation between 1989 and 1990 c. what is the price index for 1989 d. what is the price index for 1991



Current Year Base Year Index

1988 1.20 1.20

1989 1.50

1990 1.75

1991 1.45

2006-11-01 14:50:36 · 1 answers · asked by jessiebabie824 2

a. move in opposite directions
b. are not related
c. move in the same direction
d. are such that the nominal rate is one-half the anticipated rate

2006-11-01 14:37:57 · 3 answers · asked by jessiebabie824 2

In what ways does it effect you and your family? What would you change about the economy if you could?

2006-11-01 14:26:50 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

No, not to be trilionaires - why do they continue to fight the pressures and demands of business, economy, etc?

2006-11-01 14:19:05 · 17 answers · asked by MMike 3

2006-11-01 14:14:21 · 3 answers · asked by Ieashilyne L 1

2006-11-01 13:42:26 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-01 13:03:54 · 2 answers · asked by swampgtr96 1

2006-11-01 13:00:07 · 1 answers · asked by swampgtr96 1

2006-11-01 12:55:18 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-01 12:50:18 · 5 answers · asked by Mike G 1

2006-11-01 12:15:43 · 2 answers · asked by Jennifer 1

The rich companies are content to lock people into a cycle that is difficult to escape, racking up too much debt that they can't pay off, and shelling out a large portion of their income on interest payments. Don't get me started about criminal late payment fees.
This is good for the finance sector, but is it good for the economy as a whole? When consumers actually buy less because they have less money left over, then we are actually selling fewer consumer goods, aren't we? Is it really good to have a few powerful people in control of the money while the lower class sinks into economic turmoil?

When answering me, try to think of my reasoning not as that of a "communist", but in the same sense as Japan, for example, where they seem to think that it's good for everyone to be fairly financially sound so that everyone can participate in the economy and there aren't a lot of poor people dragging the economy as a down....

2006-11-01 12:13:04 · 4 answers · asked by KSR 2

2006-11-01 11:20:19 · 4 answers · asked by MARIE 1

i am inthe process of writting a 20 page paper on contract law/labor unions. the more detailed the answer the better. if scource in known please provide.

class:economics of law 390 college level; thanks

2006-11-01 11:06:57 · 1 answers · asked by mcnult345 1

zimbabwe failed not because of egalitarianism & justice, but lack of - the zimbabwe thing was merely a transfer from one small group to another small group - not an increase of justice or equality

and naturally the inexperienced [and more interested in spending up large with their new booty] could not do as well as the experienced & settled plunderers

but if the land had been divided fairly, the agric. production would have increased and the violence would have decreased

compare japan, reformed by general macarthur, going from defeated and firebombed nation to top nation in 50 years - or scandinavian countries, egalitarian and low violence [and highest capital formation - it makes sense that saving is going to be highest [and moneylending cheapest] where everyone can save]

zimbabwe is more like the middle east, extreme wealth/poverty, and naturally therefore extreme conflict/social unrest costs [50% of GNP]

2006-11-01 11:03:32 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

oil is used as a weapon

2006-11-01 10:24:05 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-01 10:17:59 · 11 answers · asked by down2earthgurl 2

2006-11-01 10:14:31 · 1 answers · asked by nashaka21 1

, this means the prices changed by how much between 2000 and the base year?

a. negative 80 percent
b. 20 percent
c. negative 20 percent
d. 80 percent

2006-11-01 09:26:11 · 1 answers · asked by jessiebabie824 2

Feel free to mention any other economical problems which have or are occuring to current date.

2006-11-01 09:23:38 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous