I realised how feministic the book is in nature. The book isn't that factual but there are some truths so it's like a bootleg history lesson. Women were actually the ones who dominated, women were the celebrated and everything until there was political struggle so lies were told to destroy the glorification of women. So the whole women should be subservient to men thing in the past and still carrying on today is simply something made up by men in the past. Not saying one sex is better than the other, but doesn't this goes to show that the whole gender differences thing is just stories made up by us because of humans' insatiable greed for power. And male chauvinists as well as women who still believe that it is natural for women to be at home taking care of kids would definitely have a real blast reading the book.
2007-02-25
00:22:38
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Gender Studies