Organic evolution by means of natural selection has been at play for over a billion years. "Moral" behavior and altruism is a much more recent phenomena, dating back perhaps to the Neandertal. Even then, natural selection predominated (as evidenced by the excintion of the Neandertal). Thus, why today do we feel compelled to protect people from themselves when they attempt to cull themselves from our gene pool? Is this stance truly ethical, as from a biological stand point it is not likely to lead to a betterment of our species? Which principle should take precedence, natural selection or moral values, when dealing with individuals who are engaged in suicidal or simply stupid behaviors?
2006-07-08
06:35:50
·
18 answers
·
asked by
Wayne D
3
in
Other - Social Science