Physics - August 2006

I know a lot about particle physics myself. I have very advanced questions for a physicist or even an advanced physics student with a high IQ. Answer my question by stating your qualifications and after picking you, I want to email you directly to discuss Neutrinos on a much deeper level. Thank you.

2006-08-15 13:01:20 · 6 answers · asked by Smart Dude 6

just a question

2006-08-15 12:32:58 · 12 answers · asked by scootda2nd 2

2006-08-15 12:00:11 · 3 answers · asked by Latricia W 1

2006-08-15 11:50:08 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-15 11:43:04 · 10 answers · asked by **$$ BUBBA $$** 2

OR, Would a mass with no motion have gravity(i know zero motion is impossible)--since 'GRAVITY" is a symptom of mass in motion, the faster you go, the more you mass, and thus the force is stronger. i propose mass in motion simply warps spacetime( aka the gravity well) and thats why no one can detect a gravitron. am i stupid?
i am not a physics wiz- just a layman and amateur astronomer- Ideas?

2006-08-15 11:33:27 · 10 answers · asked by scootda2nd 2

Just a random question. A black hole sucks stuff up which can't escape. Since it is a singularity, I think there is a no space or time. Does that mean no mass? what happens to the mass? does it become energy? does energy necesarily take up space? How big is the center of a black hole? is there mass inside, right up until the event horizon? or is the EH just the point where it's gravitational influence becomes inescapable.... and past the EH there is just energy.... or is there mass?

2006-08-15 11:22:47 · 8 answers · asked by thedudeomeister 2

The interferometer led to the exclusion of ether in theoretical physics.So now, with thoughts of dark matter-could that revive an ether theory, noting that just because you can't detect it, doesn't mean it's not there.

2006-08-15 10:50:05 · 6 answers · asked by Diode Dude 1

To all the phycisicts and grad students reading this - If I understand it correctly, string theory says that all matter and energy are just manifestations of strings vibrating at different frequencies. My question is this: Is there a limit to the frequencies a string may vibrate at, and what is responsible for determining these frequencies? Thanks in advance.

2006-08-15 10:41:06 · 5 answers · asked by onlysurebet 2

2006-08-15 10:40:06 · 10 answers · asked by altgrave 4

OMG mirrors can see the future watch out mirrors will take control of us all and make us there slaves!!! lol I love mirrors I hope they love me also.

2006-08-15 10:16:37 · 9 answers · asked by magpiesmn 6

2006-08-15 09:22:05 · 16 answers · asked by thepolishdude 2

2006-08-15 09:10:50 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think that He plays with carbon dating and time?

2006-08-15 08:53:34 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Can enyone explain to me what laser spectroscopy is? I know what spectroscopy is but I need to know more about laser spectroscopy...

2006-08-15 08:35:29 · 2 answers · asked by Cygnus 2

2006-08-15 08:25:38 · 8 answers · asked by goring 6

Unified theory of forces?

2006-08-15 08:14:17 · 2 answers · asked by goring 6

2006-08-15 07:52:41 · 10 answers · asked by itsd2b 1

2006-08-15 07:28:14 · 2 answers · asked by BowtiePasta 6

or any other place with zero gravity?

2006-08-15 07:16:33 · 13 answers · asked by prof_einstein 2

How many of you have done Physics in 6th form and is it hard?

Would you recommend it for someone who is passable at Science but is aiming to do business subjects such as Economics?

Thanks =)

2006-08-15 07:16:14 · 5 answers · asked by CJ 3

torch traveling at speed of light-
would the speed of the torch cancel out the speed of the light given of by it?

if light didnt travel at the speed of light would you still see it (if it was not moving at all maybe?)

2006-08-15 06:41:27 · 9 answers · asked by David K 1

2006-08-15 06:02:02 · 5 answers · asked by gerlooser 3

2006-08-15 05:59:15 · 12 answers · asked by Tolits 1

2006-08-15 05:55:08 · 4 answers · asked by Kamran M 1

2006-08-15 05:34:23 · 12 answers · asked by dan m 1

2006-08-15 05:25:20 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

you can i go to http://www.55a.net/firas/english/

2006-08-15 05:07:30 · 9 answers · asked by J 2

2006-08-15 04:55:36 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I asked if the rest mass of a photon is still zero in non-vacuum, where it's velocity is less than c. I got the answer that it is indeed still zero, because the length of the 4-vector (E/c,px,py,pz) is zero. And because this is a flat space property it's easily generalised to other coupled fields to describe non-vacuum situations: the result still holds. Now my problem is that I don't know what a flat-space property is, i.o.w. why the four-vector is still zero.

2006-08-15 04:54:50 · 4 answers · asked by helene_thygesen 4