Earth Sciences & Geology - August 2006

2006-08-04 07:23:04 · 21 answers · asked by Abhi 1

if the earth is a living being then is the humans living on earth destroying it like a disease destroys the body?

2006-08-04 07:17:07 · 8 answers · asked by anubis m 1

I am preparing for a speech.Some useful points/ideas would be useful

2006-08-04 07:16:30 · 1 answers · asked by aleem859 1

2006-08-04 06:21:44 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-04 06:07:45 · 4 answers · asked by AK 1

And i dont meen metal coating or oxidization.

2006-08-04 05:49:16 · 5 answers · asked by alexandros t 2

DeBeers monopoly etc.

2006-08-04 05:33:09 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-04 05:27:59 · 2 answers · asked by abmyd 1

over short tome scales (thousands of years), isostatic uplift may temporarily raise mountain summits to higher elevations. However, over longer term (millions of years), continyed erosion will reduce these summits to porgressively lower elevation. As this happens does the concept of the isostatic equilibrium predict for the depth of the bae continental lithospher beneath mountains? Remember that mountains float on the mantle at the base of the continental lithosphere.

2006-08-04 05:26:02 · 6 answers · asked by dat dude 1

2006-08-04 04:56:43 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/fit/chapter11.asp
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v22/i2/mammoth.asp

which says There is strong evidence that, following the Flood, for a time ice and snow covered much of Canada and northern USA, northwestern Eurasia, Greenland and Antarctica. Evolutionists believe there were many ice ages, but it’s more likely they were advance/retreat cycles within a single Ice Age.


Evolutionists find the cause of the Ice Age a mystery. Obviously the climate would need to be colder. But global cooling by itself is not enough, because then there would be less evaporation, so less snow. How is it possible to have both a cold climate and lots of evaporation?

The creationist meteorologist Michael Oard proposed that the Ice Age [possibly referred to in Job 37:10 and 38:22] was an aftermath of Noah’s Flood.18,19

What do you think of this theory

2006-08-04 04:47:23 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

The summits of t wo mountain ranges lie at different elevations: range A at about km and range B at about km. Withou knowing anything else about these mountains.

2006-08-04 04:46:43 · 3 answers · asked by dat dude 1

2006-08-04 04:01:13 · 5 answers · asked by stubbz12000 1

2006-08-04 03:05:32 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

In older textbooks, the Pennsylvanian age sedimentary rocks of the “Coal Measures” in WV were spoken of as reflecting the Cyclothems of the coal deposits in the Illinois Basin. The brief pattern would include a marine limestone at the base (identified by the presence of marine invertebrate fossils) other sedimentary rocks, then a coal bed, then other sedimentary rocks on top of the coal and finally another marine limestone. What does this sedimentary sequence suggest to you as to the sedimentary environments through time which led to the preservation of this sequence of rocks?

2006-08-04 02:40:55 · 2 answers · asked by erin h 1

well i just heard that-the o-zane layer cantains O3,and radicles. if the radicles come it contact with O3 it becomes O2 . So why then pilots,and other baloon riders wear oxygen masks (dont give me any silly answers k !)

2006-08-04 01:07:59 · 5 answers · asked by Red X 1

Did the ice age affect just the Northern hemisphere?

2006-08-03 22:10:22 · 10 answers · asked by harveybee2000 1

2006-08-03 21:40:10 · 3 answers · asked by ♪ ♫ ☮ NYbron ☮ ♪ ♫ 6

I am learning about meteorites. Some of the descriptions of various meteorites mention that the specimen has "Shock Lines"

What does this mean and what does it look like?

2006-08-03 19:25:50 · 4 answers · asked by Mr_Know_It_All 2

2006-08-03 19:03:42 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-03 18:14:38 · 13 answers · asked by Glen S 1

2006-08-03 16:31:58 · 16 answers · asked by shadow 1

2006-08-03 13:34:29 · 3 answers · asked by matilda s 1

Well... earth as prestine as it was before is just a ball of shallow water, with sea living creature as big as we know as dinosaurs. It has check and balance of evolution.

Then, a big meteor hits the earth in the middle(now called Hawaii) and made a crater(now called Ring of Fire). Plate tectonics developed. To balance the effect, earth distributed its displaced soils around the world and volcanoes was developed to give way to the massive volume of the meteor that earth engulfed...

Then, another evolution begun... from the sea to the land, a land that have been exposed directly to the sun... and dinosaurs as we know them has evolved from it...

Then another meteor hits the earth! This time in Mexico, that have ended the dinosaur evolution era!

Fantasy world is it not? But do you think this could have had happened?

P.S.: I know it is against Darwin's Theory and also of the present scietific findings of tectonic movements as the movements still occurs today.

2006-08-03 13:21:44 · 2 answers · asked by wacky_racer 5

Which on do you believe and why is the other one not plausable to you?

2006-08-03 12:52:21 · 12 answers · asked by R R 3

If it was used to create steam like a nuclear reactor does

2006-08-03 12:32:17 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-03 12:03:44 · 3 answers · asked by tomrharvey60 2

2006-08-03 11:43:06 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-03 10:23:10 · 5 answers · asked by Michael B 1

It's talking about metamorphism and Metamorphic rocks

2006-08-03 09:59:24 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous