A post flood ice age? Does the evidense point toward that?

Question

http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/fit/chapter11.asp
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v22/i2/mammoth.asp

which says There is strong evidence that, following the Flood, for a time ice and snow covered much of Canada and northern USA, northwestern Eurasia, Greenland and Antarctica. Evolutionists believe there were many ice ages, but it’s more likely they were advance/retreat cycles within a single Ice Age.


Evolutionists find the cause of the Ice Age a mystery. Obviously the climate would need to be colder. But global cooling by itself is not enough, because then there would be less evaporation, so less snow. How is it possible to have both a cold climate and lots of evaporation?

The creationist meteorologist Michael Oard proposed that the Ice Age [possibly referred to in Job 37:10 and 38:22] was an aftermath of Noah’s Flood.18,19

What do you think of this theory

interestingly as there are 157 or so flood legends form cultures accross the earth, it is interesting that some aborigenes from very hot climates add that the waters turned to ice
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation...

and in the case of the book of Job which is about a story about aman in Saudi Arabia describes God freezing the broad waters and consistent with a cultural memory of an ice age

Answer 1

Guess what, there is AERO evidence for any worldwide flood at anytime in the geologic record. There are a lot of stries about floods because floods are common, and there is a lot of evidence for local floods in the geologic record, but in fact the record points to the fact that the world NEVER could have been completely flooded.

Also, answersingenesis.org is NOT a credible scientific site.

Answer 2

This is a crackpot religious theory in guise of real science..
Religions are now making up fake science in order to keep
at least some semblance of credibility...

Answer 3

It is stupid and non-scientific. Science doesn't deal with the Bible.