The acting is only decent on Donald Sutherland and Keirra Knightly's parts. The rest of them fail to put emotion into their words. It's not really that accurate to the book, and they did a lousy job with Keirra's clothing(she doesn't have much of a top anyway, but the baggy dress doesn't help any!), all the girls' hair, and the film itself focuses on too much of the hard aspects of life in that era, which isn't at all what Jane Austin wanted depicted. Grant you, I may just be prejudiced against it(hehe, no pun intended), but I just dislike the film altogether, especially when comparing it to the version with Jennifer Ehle and Colin Firthe. There was more emotion and better acting. Yes, there are problems with this version too, but it is comparitavely much better. Would anyone like to interject their opinion?
Source:
An almost-15-year-old-girl
2006-06-14
08:04:37
·
19 answers
·
asked by
annarie14
2