Gentle historians,
Help me to understand this vexing situation of crossed swords, this battle of minds.
John N. posted question in the History Forum:
Before the 19th century, the United States had never seen it. What is it?
My response was Answer #1:
A baby born in 1801.
And you, distinguished reader, will understand: the 19th-Century began in 1801 – so BEFORE the 19th Century, no one in the United States had seen a baby born in 1801. In other words, from the beginning of time up to the 19th Century, no one in the US had seen a baby born in 1801.
Then this guy (we’ll call him Answer #5) offered his opinion:
remeber the 19th century is the 1800's .... so a baby in 1801 would not count
Am I not understanding his response?
Why doesn't the baby count? More specifically, why does Answerer #5 HATE BABIES? How can someone hate babies? They are so cute.
So who is the idiot – me or him? (No credit for the obvious answer that we’re both idiots.)
2007-12-07
05:47:19
·
5 answers
·
asked by
John W
5