The few survivors would be speaking German today.
Most likely, he would have dropped on Russia and England
2007-12-07 05:30:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Der Schreckliche 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
i would say England 1st, then the USA if he still had the chance. i don't think it would have had the same effect as when the US dropped the bomb in Japan though, i think the American population wouldn't have tolerated this type of action towards an ally and would have dropped the A bomb on Germany as well as Japan. I think that type of action would have dragged the conflict out further if all of the Nazi's hadn't been obliterated by the bomb. but i also think that if that type of action was taken the US would end up with more enemies, therefore causing more strife in the US.
2007-12-07 05:39:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by melstxi055 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, the Germans were several years away from having the bomb according to the latest findings.
However, there's no doubt that a large part of western Russia would have become a glass parking lot. Hitler hated the communists more than the UK or USA.
The other allies would have dropped one on Berlin.
2007-12-07 05:44:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by gromit801 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
He would have dropped it on London, and then on Moscow. He had no delivery system capable of reaching the U.S. but once he wiped out the Brits and the Russians, he would have had more time to develop a bomber capable of reaching New York.
There's a good chance he would have conquered the world, but the U.S. probably would have developed mid-air refueling techniques before he got a bomber, and used the B-29 to drop the A-Bomb on Germany before he got the chance to drop it on the U.S.
At that point it would have been a tossup, but I give the edge to the U.S. because of the industrial capability, and the fact that we were and are protected by the distances involved.
2007-12-07 05:34:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dirty Dave 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
the 200 odd Russian divisions were always more threat to the Third Reich than the Allies forces in France ( we're assuming operational capability somewhere after Normandy) .....Hitler would have dropped every one but one on the Russians and the last one on London just for spite.......although one on Paris isn't out of the question......
and as was mentioned, in the long run B-29's from New England and Canada would have turned everything from Bonn to Warsaw into radioactive slag.....
2007-12-07 06:36:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by yankee_sailor 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
London would have been 1st. No question. That would have freed up resources to defend and re-attack the Eastern front where the entire goal of the nazi effort was concentrated. Their goal was to go get to the oil in the MIddle East. A backbreaking strike on London would have sucked British units out of Northern Africa and a straigh shot to Egypt/Sinia would have been in reach...
2014-10-19 05:21:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it somewhat is a daunting concept, if the u.s. grow to be prepared to apply it, I haven't any doubt Hitler might have used it additionally. i think of his aim might merely approximately even have been London. the effects could have been horendous, and can i think of have started a tit for tat A-Bomb conflict. i do no longer think of even if it would have altered the end result nevertheless, with the aid of fact in spite of the certainty that right this moment, god knows how many bombs there are in the worldwide, ceratinly adequate to wipe out mankind various cases over. yet once you think of it by, and it is the 1st time for me to be trustworthy, Berlin could have been next. u.s. could have been thoroughly out of variety for some destiny years, so i think of that ought to have been the tip of it, or actually very on the brink of it. Thank god we are able to easily theorise approximately it. there is another element to think of approximately, estimates variety broadly yet approximately 60,000 have been killed in Hiroshima and approximately 40,000 in Nagasaki. Allied bombing in Dresden killed approximately 250,000, it is merely that it took over one thousand bombers no longer merely one to do it, and don't overlook the firebombing of Berin and Hamburg, so we killed our trustworthy proportion.
2016-10-10 11:42:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sprecken se duetch?
2007-12-07 06:47:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by acmeraven 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
we would be speaking Deutsch
2007-12-07 05:31:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by credo quia est absurdum 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
We wouldn't be talking about it...
2007-12-07 05:35:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by armybrat86 1
·
0⤊
0⤋