I have to wonder why people are satisfied with the type of programming the WWE produces. They average about 20 minutes of wrestling (if you're lucky) per 2 hour show, while TNA gets in alomst twice that in an hour show. Usually you get close to an hour more wrestling on a PPV opposed to WWE. Maybe someone can explain to me why the WWE is an appealing product. It can't be for the quality of wrestling, because TNA wrestling is alot more entertaining to watch. It has to be something else. If anyone can give a good answer without telling me it's because Cena rules, or you suck because you're hatin' on WWE, I'd be much appreciated. I don't totally hate WWE either, it's just that there hasn't been anything entertaining about a WWE show in years. (The DX reunion is a start, but I have a feeling it's going to get ruined too.) So there's the perameters. Happy debating.
2006-06-27
23:38:24
·
19 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous