i'm gonna attempt to settle the debate between the sport with tougher guys
you could make an argument for rugby because they have no pads. however, the hits they make are more of "everyone pile on the guy with the ball" than football. this is the only case i can think of for rugby
in football, the emphasis is knock the crap out of the guy with the ball, and then everyone dog piles you. every single play, at least 8 guys on the team will try to completley knock the crap out of the other team. in rugby, one guy gets people to jump on him. in football, a 254 pound brian ulacher rocks a 200 pound tomlinson, and then smashes him to the ground. in rugby, a guy gets dogpiled.
if guys didn't wear pads in foot ball, they'd die. if guys didn't wear cups in rugby, they'd be fine (that was just a joke.)
what aer your reasons for which sport involves tougher guys? why?
2006-10-09
15:21:49
·
18 answers
·
asked by
phliuy
2