Cricket - June 2006

2006-06-25 23:47:37 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-25 22:15:20 · 14 answers · asked by pali 2

2006-06-25 21:05:42 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-25 19:04:38 · 9 answers · asked by Praveen J 2

2006-06-25 15:40:38 · 11 answers · asked by flamen s 2

Yesterday I saw a posting on BBC's TMS message board written by someone, that Jeoffery Boycott said, before the ODI series started, that even his "grandmother" could beat Sri Lanka. Or did he say that all the catches that England missed in the first test at Loard's could have taken by his grandmum? Which one Is true? If the former is true, what does he have to say now?

2006-06-25 07:42:27 · 4 answers · asked by Teejay 5

What do you think is gonna happen to the current series played in England? Is Sri Lanka gonna win 5-0 over England? Is it gonna be a new record if they do? Has England been beaten 5-0 before? I don't think that England can take it anymore..Why can't they beat the Lankans?

2006-06-25 06:31:28 · 12 answers · asked by Teejay 5

2006-06-25 05:35:33 · 4 answers · asked by shantanu 1

2006-06-25 04:11:53 · 2 answers · asked by Mujju 1

plz all the procedure time place all relvants for under19 trial and outsider can gvie these trails or not.if i want to ply for any good how i can join that team plz give all details as soon as possible.

2006-06-25 04:07:24 · 2 answers · asked by raghvendra p 1

2006-06-25 02:49:12 · 6 answers · asked by anjumeenaa 2

2006-06-25 00:24:59 · 32 answers · asked by aqil s 1

2006-06-25 00:22:40 · 17 answers · asked by gops 1

england invented all sports.have a large population,are fairly rich and yet everyone beats them,all the time.Why?

2006-06-24 23:16:56 · 10 answers · asked by raspberrycheesecake 2

2006-06-24 22:36:44 · 3 answers · asked by Elegant 2

I think yes ... unless Vaughan returns

2006-06-24 22:35:19 · 6 answers · asked by DPC 5

2006-06-24 21:30:00 · 14 answers · asked by Ross 1

2006-06-24 16:29:44 · 25 answers · asked by dhrumil 1

o

2006-06-24 15:35:12 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-24 13:00:31 · 7 answers · asked by sovisr 2

2006-06-24 12:23:22 · 16 answers · asked by harry dhillon 1

2006-06-24 06:10:49 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-24 05:12:47 · 8 answers · asked by kumaran 1

2006-06-24 04:45:36 · 15 answers · asked by Naved 1

ICC is planning to make few changes, after the Ponting incident, a month ago. Dave Richardson heads a committee that plans to make amendments that let a team to ask questions on an umpire’s decision & refer it to the Third umpire. A fixed quota will be allotted for each team (not sure if it’s for each player)

1) Would this remove the human element of the game? The human element in a game brings added excitement.
2) Referring decisions means it takes so much time from the playing hours. How can ICC compensate this lost time- reducing the number of overs in a 50 over game?
3) According to stats released (every single match played is reviewed & umpire’s decisions are evaluated) an average of almost 94% decisions are true! So do we still need this?

Sorry this question took so long. I should have asked this atleast couple of weeks ago! I don’t have the latest info on this topic. Maybe I missed some updates.

2006-06-24 03:07:31 · 3 answers · asked by avalanche 3

2006-06-24 02:51:26 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-06-24 01:16:52 · 13 answers · asked by ? 4

i´m doing kind of survey, so vote for your favorite player, and i will close this polling after 10 days, and will write you in my next question (about this topic), so your just 3 or 4 clicks with your mouse can earn your player, the favorite player from public.

thanks!

2006-06-24 00:09:36 · 41 answers · asked by Tony 2

so what up my life is gay it toke of with my boyfriend

2006-06-23 21:46:35 · 12 answers · asked by joejoe 2

or any team?
one i know-RSA

2006-06-23 20:49:09 · 12 answers · asked by Born Wild 2