Biology - November 2007

A. carbohydrates
B. lipids
C. fatty acids
D. nucleic acids

2007-11-27 09:01:06 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

Hey please tell me that you know this

What are the end products of mitosis? Of meiosis?

2007-11-27 09:00:24 · 4 answers · asked by audi2402 1

2007-11-27 08:54:57 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

A) mostly cytosine.
B) a copy of the DNA identical to the nuclear gene.
C) a copy of noncoding DNA.
D) a DNA copy of mRNA.

2007-11-27 08:51:32 · 1 answers · asked by laundromatic 1

2007-11-27 08:49:34 · 2 answers · asked by stina 1

A colour- blind woman marries a man with normal vission. They have ten children, six boys and four girls. Remember colour blindness is sex-linked.

2007-11-27 08:48:28 · 2 answers · asked by mama bear 1

2007-11-27 08:48:25 · 3 answers · asked by stina 1

2007-11-27 08:47:22 · 2 answers · asked by stina 1

For my bio class we have to do a lab report on a lab we did. I finished everything, but one question on the questions sheet, please help me answer it so i can finish it, so here is the question:

What advantages do plant cells have over animal cells?

First person who gives a good detail, well detailed enough that i understand what it says, and not soo detailed that i have to look up words. *doesnt have a big vocab* Will get best answer. Thank you whoever answers this >:D<

2007-11-27 08:28:48 · 4 answers · asked by allisoncho7 2

Help me out with Pshychology!

2007-11-27 08:24:55 · 3 answers · asked by Sooo. 3

2007-11-27 08:09:14 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am kind of comfortable with the idea that seas of petrochemicals like those identified on Europa could somehow end up forming the most basic forms of life i.e. the ingredients are there. I am however fascinated by the problem that if life is an inevitable consequence of the right ingredients and an awful lot of time then why there isn't more evidence of the creation of life occuring throughout history. Could oil be less the remains of many dead animals or the breeding ground of life itself. Crackpot stuff maybe but I would like to know other peoples opinions.

2007-11-27 07:49:06 · 11 answers · asked by doof888 1

2007-11-27 07:09:34 · 2 answers · asked by Achiote 2

please help me answer this question in the next few hours. Thanks

2007-11-27 06:12:06 · 6 answers · asked by ashbabyf29 1

I am trying to write science homework but do not know when to use which word! :S

2007-11-27 05:46:09 · 10 answers · asked by wendym63 2

Many scientists state that evolution is indeed a fact, but are they just saying that because they refuse to accept that it's still classified a theory?

2007-11-27 04:42:33 · 30 answers · asked by WetBiscuit 2

2007-11-27 04:36:04 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-27 04:23:06 · 5 answers · asked by damigurl05 1

2007-11-27 03:28:36 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

I had a test earlier today and there was this question that I just could not figure out. Question:

All of the following are examples of post-translational modification except:

a. joining of two or more subunits to form a quaternary structure
b. attachment of sugars, lipids or phosphate groups
c. division of the chain into sections
d. removal of primers


I do not want to have to wait until next week to find out the answer to the question, so could someone help me out please? Thanks.

2007-11-27 03:28:16 · 1 answers · asked by lety 2

2007-11-27 01:55:39 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-27 01:52:53 · 1 answers · asked by folake 1

2007-11-27 01:17:10 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

if people think evolution is real why did evolution stop all of a sudden? why not keep going on. or did it ever really happen maybe it was meant that monkeys be mans best friend instead of the dog... since monkeys have 99.4% of our genes.... and why is it that just the people we came from(monkeys) died off yet there were animals in the wild that out lived.... i mean because if all of them died off and we just keep evolving where did the other monkeys come from.... and of course how can you say that god isnt real and its just a theory... evolution is just a therory because if they only have 99.4% of our genes what happened to the other. they dont havethe full 100% yet we were evolved from them? we would have everything they had... why dont mokeys have the skills we have today.... we evolved from them so wouldnt they have had to have the talking skill first?

2007-11-27 01:06:31 · 8 answers · asked by dudeitsme411 1

These questions are part of my research into Enzyme kinetics:-

1) Where in the yeast cell will this process of alcoholic fermentation take place? Explain your answer?

2) What would you expect to see in terms of carbon dioxide production if there were more oxygen available? Explain your answer?

Thanks a lot for your help. your efforts won't be wasted, i will give 10 points for the best answer!

2007-11-26 23:04:57 · 2 answers · asked by varghese p 3

2007-11-26 22:37:33 · 4 answers · asked by halfkidd 1

including researchers’ plagiarizing others’ work, using other scientists’ methods to develop lucrative patents, or just plain fabricating data. How important an issue is this for society? What are the boundary lines of ethical scientific behavior? How should the scientific community or society “police” scientists? What punishments would be appropriate for violations of scientific ethics?

2007-11-26 20:17:19 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

two paragraphs pls....... tnx!!!!!!!

2007-11-26 20:06:14 · 8 answers · asked by Ailyn F 1

10 points to the first person who knows the correct answer to why fish really can't breathe on land (or any animal with gills for that matter).

2007-11-26 18:00:39 · 19 answers · asked by JMan 3

Personally i don't believe in evolution because i believe that the awesome and almighty God created the world. i have reason to believe that because of a lot of stuff that i'm learning abt evolution and its counter arguements. here's some:

irreducable complexity - says that substances and particles couldn't have evolved because they need all their parts to work. If one of the parts is missing, then it cannot work, so mutations cannot support this theory. example: flagellum motor - research michael behe (darwin's black box)

mutations - almost all mutations are bad. if evolution is true then almost all the things that we see today, would have had to come from billions and billions of mutations. yeah, evolution says that it took billions and billions of yeas for these to occur, but why are we not seeing mutations and evolution today?

More: how do u explain entropy, DNA (which is crazy!), cambrian explosion - when fossils of different animals appeared at same time, teleology etc ?

2007-11-26 16:17:39 · 18 answers · asked by muthu 2