if lets say a robber, robs a bank and some police step in to take him away. But useally the robber has the gun, so the police have to beat him down to get the gun away. But lets say an another robber beats up a man to take away,lets say his wallet. wouldn't the police be no help if they beat up the robber that doesn't give in. Cause the officers would be arrested for beating down a man, that only had a gun that useally have no bullets in it for just imatation. So the other robber therefor would be arrested but not the police?
Don't be offended police men cause i have been thinking about this for only 2 minutes. This might be confusing to ppl who are under the age of 13...which really shouldn't be on here.
2006-08-08
00:38:02
·
23 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Polls & Surveys