Would it be fair to say that Summerslam (SS) is a better wrestling product than Wrestlemania (WM)
Because WM is usually just very hyped matches that can be fast and exciting but not alot of in-ring skill.
While at Summerslam most matches are pure wrestling matches that are entertaining more so for the workrate not the big names or hype.
For instance watched WM for only the actual matches bell- to bell and nothing else it would not be as good as if you did that with SS.
For instance Wrestlemania 22 was presented very good ith big names hype pyro and all that, however Summerslam 06 had better matches
You know how Rock vs Hogan was big at Wrestlemania only because of the names in it but if you had that same match with lets say Chavo Guerreo vs Carlito. With all the same moves spots and finish you would care less.
But the Summerslam match with Rock vs Triple H vs Kurt Angle was very good. And still probably would have got pops if you had that match with mid carders in there place.
What do you think
2007-07-26
08:58:33
·
19 answers
·
asked by
King of Kings fan
5