Earth Sciences & Geology - January 2007

2007-01-26 03:05:54 · 6 answers · asked by tcw_rickieg 1

to the nearest 10 will do. it's for a bet!

2007-01-26 03:05:22 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

where can i see it, when can i see it, why is it what it is

2007-01-26 02:57:48 · 12 answers · asked by teardrops.a^o7 1

2007-01-26 01:46:55 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-26 00:59:21 · 8 answers · asked by aran 2

it lasted for 3 seconds where i live (queens ny)

2007-01-25 22:45:53 · 8 answers · asked by Santard 1

2007-01-25 21:29:00 · 5 answers · asked by sivaranjani s 2

2007-01-25 20:48:29 · 1 answers · asked by olivajoh 1

2007-01-25 20:43:11 · 10 answers · asked by hbouiri 2

2007-01-25 19:32:45 · 13 answers · asked by Camsmiria 1

2007-01-25 18:20:39 · 8 answers · asked by jp 1

2007-01-25 18:20:38 · 13 answers · asked by Jstevens 2

2007-01-25 14:18:42 · 3 answers · asked by sheri 2

My theory is that there was a change in the gravitational pull on earth , maybe caused by a collision or some other reason.
This would obviously effect the abilty of these massive beasts like the terrasaur a large ungainly creature being abe to fly, and also effect the size of the land dwelling creatures. If there was a change this would surely kill all the dinosaurs off, as this would cause them all to die of exhausion or lack of food , or not being able to physicaly fly or hunt for food.
I just cant imagine how these prehistoric beast could live in todays environment. Unless they had a low center of gravity like the crocodile.

I have never heared a mention of this on any TV programmes or books.

Can anyone tell me if there is a reason my theory could not be true

serious answers please.

2007-01-25 13:36:21 · 14 answers · asked by zoon 2

2007-01-25 13:26:06 · 3 answers · asked by ✶ 4

can anyone help me find a topic for the science fair please...if so thank you..<3333

2007-01-25 13:20:45 · 5 answers · asked by Tyne A 1

2007-01-25 13:03:33 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is it because of the thermohaline currents? the salinity?

2007-01-25 12:54:56 · 3 answers · asked by wash_yer_nuts 3

2007-01-25 12:43:48 · 18 answers · asked by kimberlinus 1

2007-01-25 12:32:32 · 14 answers · asked by jstn_le 1

science hwk ugh

2007-01-25 12:22:41 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

is it water pollution or is it just global warming?

2007-01-25 12:19:55 · 5 answers · asked by quin h 1

oh ya and what does this mean leaching is the process in which nitrogen is lost into ________, ___________, and _________.

2007-01-25 12:14:39 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-25 12:09:12 · 7 answers · asked by ronny k 3

i need these in order for a Big Test tomorrow
it starts with precambrian, cambrain ---something,--paleozoic--i dont know--- to cenozoic
i need the right answers please. dont answer if you dont know.

2007-01-25 11:43:03 · 4 answers · asked by hairspray queen 5

Hi, im doing a school project and I need a good video of the 1989 san francisco earthquake, I asked here because I know it happened during a world series game and I thought maybe some of you guys have the footage of the actual game when it begins to happen. I searched in youtube, yahoo video, google video and found nothing that was kinda good. PLEASE HELP. thanks

2007-01-25 11:35:21 · 2 answers · asked by Guido F 2

Serious answers please, this is an honest question.

2007-01-25 11:24:26 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

ok i am doing a geography paper where i have to do landform identificatian and causes which i have been able to find out but there is another section that says other info so i need to know other fascinating things about our landform help due tomorrow

2007-01-25 10:33:50 · 4 answers · asked by angela b 2

2007-01-25 10:23:29 · 5 answers · asked by Clarissa R 1

Can dino blood really survive for 65 millions years? http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/606 The evolutionist scientists that discovered it (Mary Schweitzer) cliams there must be some - as yet undiscovered- mechanism which has preserved the cells. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/02/0221_060221_dino_tissue_2.html but isn't a more credible explanation that they are not very old. After all there is much other evidence that man and dinosaurs (aka dragons) have coexisted. http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3061/

"The whole subject of DNA preservation in fossils is controversial" they say! Too right - the evidence points to the fact that dinosaurs did not live millions of years ago.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/07/060725-fossil-bone_2.html

2007-01-25 09:55:06 · 11 answers · asked by a Real Truthseeker 7