English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Biology - July 2007

[Selected]: All categories Science & Mathematics Biology

2007-07-12 06:38:45 · 18 answers · asked by AQEEL A 1

I mean we've lived with them for millions of years and we havn't gone extinct yet. The bacteria aren't as harmful as the media makes them look. And if we try to sanitize everything that just makes the bacteria problem worse because then we don't build up an immunity to them and they build up an immunity to out antibacterial cleaners. Yes we should sanitize some things like doctors before they go into surgury or if we are extreamly dirty. But we also need bacteria, even harmful bacteria, because e-coli helps us digest our food, and harmful bacteria makes us stronger. So all I'm saying is people don't have to worry about bacteria so much, we've lived with them for millions of years.

2007-07-12 06:19:38 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-12 06:14:21 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-12 06:12:26 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

If you think about our presence, what do we contribute to nature? Waste, pollution, and death. We feed off of the earth and all of its inhabitants. So, aren't we parasites?

2007-07-12 06:05:53 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do humans have strong phermones too...? lol. Like can we attract people, just by the "smell" we give off?

2007-07-12 06:04:50 · 2 answers · asked by Anthony L 3

2007-07-12 05:53:56 · 3 answers · asked by DUNX 2

LIke how? it seems our body is capable of renenwing itself forever so why does it slow down at all? it seems like a stupid question but our body seems to be able to carry out functions without a brain so why cant we keep living?

2007-07-12 04:15:30 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Were mammals, in general are purpose is to stay alive, "fight of the fittest" Yet why do we care about others? Try and not be really obvious. In sense every other human is competition

2007-07-12 04:13:29 · 16 answers · asked by ♣Kermit the Frog♣ 4

So I'm stealing this idea from an Answer I read in one of my Contact's posts a long time ago, so I hope he doesn't mind.

Anyway, he mentioned that we would never tolerate this kind of "fraud" from any non-religious organization, and I started thinking... He's right, but does "religious freedom" extend to the right to misrepresent the work of others? For example, numerous creationist authors use misleading quotations from scientists, ID advocates have (apparently) designed their movement not out of religious doctrine but through the use of media advisors and legal experts.

Should we (scientists) all file suit for denegration of our profession? Is that even possible?

2007-07-12 02:11:53 · 11 answers · asked by Brad H 4

What is the Vegetative Structure of a Leaf...

2007-07-11 23:21:47 · 2 answers · asked by Hybrid Angel 2

2007-07-11 20:39:37 · 5 answers · asked by tekodex 1

the proof is there for evolution, but not for creationists...

2007-07-11 17:38:37 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

true or false details please

2007-07-11 16:58:55 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-11 13:40:29 · 5 answers · asked by jacquelinegrebos 2

2007-07-11 13:07:14 · 2 answers · asked by pammy_522 1

Why don't fish start walking and turning into humans

2007-07-11 12:35:11 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

when a patient recieves an interavenous solution it usually is isotonic with reference to blood cells. this means it has the same concentration of dissolved materials as blood. please explain why this is neccessary?

2007-07-11 12:03:42 · 2 answers · asked by mommy Ty 3

2007-07-11 10:58:21 · 7 answers · asked by Punkin 1

or do you have a chart that would tell this kind of information? thanks

2007-07-11 09:01:08 · 2 answers · asked by MotherKittyKat 7

I know I have to take chemistry, calculus, and physics... basically as many math and science classes as I can. That's what I read, anyway.

2007-07-11 08:00:26 · 6 answers · asked by Not Dave 2

If we came from apes, then why are they still on earth and why are there so many different thoeries on how we became human. I understand that there are many different types, but was a certain type of primate better than others, and that;s the one that turned into a human? I just don't believe that i came from a Monkey!

2007-07-11 07:44:32 · 26 answers · asked by Nitza 1

I am a high school senior and am planning to study a 3 year microbiology course for college with a combination of three subjects. The college offers microbiology, chemistry and zoology or botany. Can anyone suggest me the better choice in between zoology and botany ?

2007-07-11 05:50:36 · 10 answers · asked by guyfromthesky 2

Are cartilage cells unable to go through mitosis?

2007-07-11 02:25:45 · 6 answers · asked by goldilocks 2

I mean, there has to be an explanation as to how people fall in love with someone... it can't just be in the air.... what triggers all those emotions etc, etc?

2007-07-11 00:30:56 · 5 answers · asked by ilsa_as91 2

2007-07-10 23:53:22 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Surely this would have made things more difficult during the dark ages? How would the cave men have been able to see what was going on properly?

2007-07-10 23:34:55 · 16 answers · asked by Leanne 2

well, they said that there's a missing link on the theory of evolution, and if that missing link is found, it will be proven that we descended from apes/monkeys.. companies actually spend billions and billions of money to find this missing link... but the question is, why is it so important to find out if the theory of evolution is true? why spend a lot of money just to prove a theory? what will happen to our lives if it is proven? will the status of your life change? or not?


please help me, i need your opinions..

(this is my homework, by the way)

^_^

2007-07-10 23:28:30 · 21 answers · asked by sushi 1

A biological indicator used in autoclaving is a vial containing 10^9 Geobacillus stearothermophilus cels that is placed in the autoclave with the material to be sterilized. After autoclaving the vial is incubated and examined for growth. Why is this species used as opposed to E.coli or G. subtilis?

2007-07-10 23:22:55 · 2 answers · asked by Hiroshi 2

Does natural selection should favour organisms who can create information out of entropy?

2007-07-10 23:15:03 · 4 answers · asked by mesun1408 6

fedest.com, questions and answers