I would go solar. It does cost more in the beginning but you see the savings and get your money back quickly.
2007-12-18 06:54:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by ziggy_brat 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
First one is an entire lie. The liberals do no longer % to supply up the pipeline, they % it rerouted - through fact the human beings it quite is going to impact do no longer % it acceptable over their water furnish. Coal is extra high priced than organic gas, so utilities have been switching to it - yet it somewhat is the EPA's fault? No. organic gas is great, yet placing off earthquakes to get it quite is counter efficient. I wager there is the kind to nevertheless get it devoid of most of the matters we've seen. it quite is nevertheless a quite new technologies which will strengthen. very few human beings oppose hydroelectric ability. i admire Nuclear ability merely great. So like an excellent form of the belongings you post, you're incorrect. you preserve puzzling what your decision in media tells you the liberals are "somewhat" like with somewhat human beings. That on no account works.
2016-10-08 21:11:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Did you know that you can go to any library and see how to build solar panels very cheaply. The batteries are the expensive part, but the new ones hold so much more energy. Wind turbines are good.
2007-12-18 12:33:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by babs 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The CHEAPEST way is to ship in oil from someplace else. But I bet that isn't what you want to hear. The CHEAPEST non oil way is hydroelectric; build a dam and water powered generators.
2007-12-18 06:58:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
It varies with the location. You can't use tidal energy in the middle of the Sahara, biomass in Antarctica, or solar where it rains almost every day.
2007-12-18 09:23:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Solar, wind and water energy sources are pretty cheap because they're readily available. You can read about them here:
http://www.greenstudentu.com/energy.aspx
2007-12-19 05:10:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
two ways to look at it to can go wind mill but there is inconsistency in the wind. solar is next as long as it is not like seattle with alot of clouds. then there is hydro electric then again continual running water from falls or major river
2007-12-19 01:39:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by den d 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You cannot create energy, only convert it from one form to another. The specific answer will depend on your specfic location.
2007-12-18 07:44:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Solar energy is very afordable. I have a solar powered calculator. However if it is dark or cloudy... it doesn't work. It is very eco friednly.
2007-12-18 07:55:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by lola 2
·
0⤊
0⤋