It is clear from their own publications that they have changed their position:
"Question: The fact that our Lord received worship is claimed by some to be an evidence that while on earth he was God the Father disguised in a body of flesh and not really a man. Was he really worshiped, or is the translation faulty? Answer: Yes, we believe our Lord Jesus while on earth was really worshiped, and properly so . . . " (Zion’s Watch Tower, July 15, 1898, 216).
"Religious leaders of Christendom followed the same course. They replaced the name Jehovah with ‘God’ (‘Allah’ in Arabic) and ‘Lord.’ That contributed to the development of the false doctrine of the Trinity, which has no basis in the Holy Scriptures. Because of this, millions mistakenly worship Jesus and the holy spirit and consider them equal to God" (The Watchtower, November 1, 1993, 4).
How did this reversal happen over a time span of almost 100 years?
2007-10-10
13:07:27
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
More quotes:
"Since Jehovah God now reigns as King by means of his capital organization Zion, then whosoever would worship him must also worship and bow down to Jehovah’s Chief One in that capital organization, namely, Christ Jesus, his Co-regent on the throne of The Theocracy" (The Watchtower, October 15, 1945, 313).
"Hebrews 1:6 relates to Jesus’ position under God. . . . Though Psalm 97:7, which speaks about worshiping God, was applied to Christ at Hebrews 1:6, Paul had shown that the resurrected Jesus is ‘the reflection of [God’s] glory and the exact representation of his very being’ (Heb. 1:1–3). So any ‘worship’ the angels give God’s Son is relative and is directed through him to Jehovah" (The Watchtower, January 15, 1992, 23; brackets in original).
"From Jesus’ words and actions, it is clear that only Jehovah God is to be worshiped" (The Watchtower, May 1, 1989, 18).
2007-10-10
13:08:54 ·
update #1
Achtung_Heiss: A well thought out answer, but with one short coming. These were teachings from the Watch Tower Society, not my opinions. Explain how within a 100 years the teachings can be 180° apart. After all, God is eternal and unchanging, correct?
2007-10-11
11:37:09 ·
update #2