English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

Why not? It's not anymore hypocritical than Al Gore.

2007-06-21 10:56:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Did you personally hand the $5 to Ralph? I'm certain it must have thrilled him to death if you did. :)

Who are you kidding--no one can oppose clean air. Sure, some of us like to have a smoke, some of us live in areas where our cars don't need to go through emissions--but nobody wants filthy air. Factories, dry cleaners, paint shops, etc. give off all sorts of crap into the air.

If you do oppose clean air, that would mean that you also oppose clean water :D

2007-06-21 13:20:53 · answer #2 · answered by Holiday Magic 7 · 1 0

Ralf Nader was a loser and still is.Remember when his book "unsafe at any speed" came out about the Chevy corvair,he didn't bother mentioning that he was racing 1 at the time.If they were so unsafe why was he racing them.This man was the start of GM problems and they've been going downhill ever since.Remember it takes green to be green.

2007-06-21 10:54:42 · answer #3 · answered by robert s 1 · 1 2

Nope. Nader is a "consumer activist" not an "environmental activist".

But if you keep drinking at the aloha bar you'll be "green" in the morning!

2007-06-21 10:42:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Nope. yet I do think of that the two Obama and McCain are poor alternatives and that i'm ill of throwing my vote away to a poor candidate. i'm vote casting for Bob Barr, he's the Libertarian candidate. I certainly have inspired my acquaintances am kin who've voiced disdain for Obama and McCain, to study the celebration/candidate they actually % out with and vote for that individual. So, I say, in case you like Nader's positions, then decide for it! BTW: for each individual saying it particularly is a wasted vote: Having third events is what keeps our equipment extra truthful. If extra human beings might vote for what they believed in extremely than throwing their palms up and saying they have no selection, we would stay in a extra advantageous place. effect from third events have constantly seeped into mainstream politics. rewarding somebody with your vote once you experience they do no longer deserve that's a waste.

2016-10-18 07:11:51 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The only way you can be considered "Green" is if you register to become of member of the Green party.

Your Political party affiliation is worth more then your personal opinion anyway.

2007-06-21 11:27:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

yeah in a mouldy way

are you a mutant and develloping gils,to be so unconcerned about clean air
but be warned the waters are also becoming contaminated ,
Unless of course you are an Alien and your space craft is revving up in the back yard

2007-06-21 12:26:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

You OPPOSE clean air???
I've got an old coal mine you can move into; the rent's too high, but you'll breathe in all the noxious, poisonous air your lungs can handle! -RKO- 06/21/07

2007-06-21 11:50:47 · answer #8 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 2 1

how can you oppose clean air?? you don't want good health for you and others around you? go green

2007-06-21 12:41:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

oppose clean air? What about your kids?

2007-06-21 10:39:50 · answer #10 · answered by Mr. Vitamin C 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers