Pervez.........
I think he is the one
he also deserve worse than this soon!
2007-12-27 18:25:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by kavya n 3
·
3⤊
3⤋
Let's face it. IF, IF, IF Al Qaeda is really the terrorist organization that the USA claims they can all retire now. The USA has taken over the job they claimed Al Qaeda was doing in the first place. The areas that the USA hasn't admittedly taken the job in their minions have. Musharraf is just a pawn in the USA's game, Bhutto was on her way to be a more presentable one then him (and at the hand of USA btw).
It was likely Musharraf's rogue little gang that did this without the USA's knowledge. That little man is scared of the USA because he knew he was on his way out. This was the only way to stop that power hungry Bhutto so that the power hungry Musharraf could maintain the small power he does have. USA is reeling over this for sure...their puppet is dead and they have to look for another. They didn't think Musharraf would disobey them and actually go ahead and kill Bhutto. I mean they could hide Bhutto's bullshit claims of wanting democracy, her felony criminal past, her thievery and corruption but they can't do that so easily with someone who actually took a govt. by military force. Now they have to start all over looking for someone and probably before Bush leaves so he can try to save his crappy reputation.
These people all suck and the loss of one like Bhutto means little in the big scheme of things.
2007-12-27 23:24:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by ~~∞§arah T∞©~~ 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Quite possibly neither of them was responsible, but it is doubtful that a clear answer will become available, as all the powerful people involved want it to be seen their way.
Another option would be a fundamentalist fanatic, acting because Benazir wanted to change the status of women in Pakistan. She wanted women to have specific rights, and to make women more equal to men.
That fact alone caused her to be hated by a great many people, almost all of them men, who cannot accept women being anything other than subordinate to them.
It is not politically correct to say this, but it is a fact. The feelings against her were widespread within Pakistan, but concentrated in the tribal areas where most of the fundamentalist teaching and training of terrorists is done.
The loss of BB is a huge loss to women in Pakistan and other Muslim countries, as she spoke with a very strong voice, in speaking out for all of them.
.
2007-12-28 08:37:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ef Ervescence 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
While al Qaeda is considered by the U.S. to be a likely suspect in the assassination of former Pakistani Prime Minister Banazir Bhutto, U.S. intelligence officials say they cannot confirm an initial claim of responsibility for the attack, supposedly from an al Qaeda leader in Afghanistan.
An obscure Italian Web site said Mustafa Abu al-Yazid, al Qaeda’s commander in Afghanistan, told its reporter in a phone call, “We terminated the most precious American asset which vowed to defeat [the] mujahedeen.”
Bhutto had been outspoken in her opposition to al Qaeda and had criticized the government of President Pervez Musharraf for failing to take strong action against the Islamic terrorists.
“She openly threatened al Qaeda, and she had American support,” said ABC News consultant Richard Clarke, the former White House counterterrorism adviser. “If al Qaeda could try to kill Musharraf twice, it could easily do this,” he said.
Al Qaeda had claimed responsibility for the bomb attack Oct. 18 during Bhutto’s homecoming rally that killed 140 people but left the former prime minister uninjured.
Senior U.S. officials say it will take several days to sort out who was responsible and that it will be “a test of credibility for the Pakistani government.”
U.S. officials monitoring Internet chat rooms known to be used by Islamic militants say several claims of responsibility have been posted, although such postings are notoriously unreliable.
President Pervez Musharraf blamed al-Qaeda when he survived two assassination attempts in 2003 in Rawalpindi, the same town where Ms Bhutto was killed in a gun and suicide bomb attack.
Pakistan said al-Qaeda number three Abu Farj Al-Libbi was the mastermind of the attacks on President Musharraf. He was arrested in 2005 and handed over to the United States.
Islamist militants have been waging an increasingly aggressive campaign in Pakistan. There have been more than 40 suicide attacks in the country this year
2007-12-27 19:44:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Syeda 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
i'm hoping you're soliciting for an opinion. i actually do no longer think of any of on right here be attentive to. Has Al Qaeda issued a assertion claiming duty yet? they decide to gloat approximately such issues. If no longer, i'm having a wager on Masharaf.
2016-10-09 07:11:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Allah knows best guys. All i know is, is that if she rules she said she would allow USA to enter Pakistan. Pakistan would have ended up like Iraq and Iran. I cant say the same may not happen now, but all i know is Pakistan needs to keep USA as far as possible. The Pakistani people would have ended up more worse off if the USA came and took over.
2007-12-28 00:29:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Peace Missile 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it probably either the link to al-Qaeda as Bhutto was so outspoken to the TV media that she was friend to US, and gained support from Americans for her democray movements. It also could be the Muslim exremist who hated woman to run politics and rule the male domained society in Isamic country.
2007-12-27 22:21:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well, this is just speculation BUT...
Al-Qaeda is only successful when it creates chaos...hence the debate between who killed Bhutto. I believe that it was Al-Qaeda because of this and I think that although this was a terrible crime - Al-Qaeda is smarter than we give them credit for.
You've got people attacking police and police cars since they think the government murdered Bhutto and Al-Qaeda is also gaining supporters because of this. The elections will probably be postponed and there will be political instability. Boom. Al-Qaeda has the most to gain and nothing to lose.
2007-12-27 18:19:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Julie D 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
Personally I feel it is someone she insulted. Not the president nor Al-Qaeda. She put everything before Islam and then she would say not so great things about Islam and women's rights etc. She said in an interview that she puts Pakistan before anything her husband and children included. Maybe someone felt she was a bad influence.
2007-12-27 20:02:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by je 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
Ok...look i am only 13..but these people in my house love the news and stuff. See my dad was talking with his friends and they were talking bout Benazir Bhutto...and they thought well my dad and cousin think no cauz musharuf needed benazir...and well...it wouldnt be a good practicing muslim...(the guy killed himself usuing a bomb)... I think.
Ok...well hope i helped.
2007-12-27 18:16:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by sillybubbles 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
The USA thrives on the unrest in other countries so they can keep control- The US govt definitely had involvement in this...I know they claimed to support her but I believe it was all a ruse so they could claim to be outraged after her killing-
2007-12-27 20:37:32
·
answer #11
·
answered by :) 6
·
2⤊
0⤋