In the race for president?
msnbc is repoting she is a liar and a deciever bent on destroying everthing America stands for, Also she is claiming she has International experience and was good friends with Benazir Bhutto for 12 years?
Does she really want to disband the Military like Bill Clinton did?
Does she really want to remove all troops from all countries and station them around the boarder of Virginia?
And make Virginia it`s own country?
Also CNBC is reporting that she said today on the campain trail that she is going to make Bill an honorary General in The Marines?
The last thing I heard was she is going to make all Zoo`s build inclosures for a new breed of Hybrid Monkey to train for border guards along Florida`s southern water border with Cuba?
2007-12-27 13:47:04 · 9 answers · asked by TigerTiger T 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
She certainly is the author of many foolish remarks and stories. Over exposure is one reason her star is tarnishing. Lack of creditability is yet another. She has made too many promises, none of which could be delivered, even if she was sincere.
Bill Clinton as an honorary Marine Corps general, are you serious ? The Marine Corps would lynch his sorry @ss if he ever attempted to don a Marine Corps uniform. The Marine Corps does not allow shameless cowards, draft dodgers, and spineless ex-politicians to share the eagle-globe and anchor with the likes of John Basilone, Chesty Puller, Dan Daly, and Ira Hayes. These were true Americans. Clinton could never stand up to the level of honor, courage, and loyalty these men displayed for their comrades and for the Corps.
As a presidential candidate Clinton is already an also ran. She will never make it to the White House. Never !
2007-12-27 14:17:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's all about trust, relationship trust. She has a great deal of baggage, as they say, from the past including the Whitewater investigation and the dishonest way her husband handled the trust he had when he was in office. The American voter is starting to weigh through this as these are very serious times. My feeling is that we've been there, done that. Let's move forward with newer, fresh and an honest energy. I'm rooting for John Edwards......McCain on the Republican ticket, both are honorable, capable men.
2007-12-27 14:08:33 · answer #2 · answered by mohanks 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Actually she is in a close race with Obama. The rest of your post looks like some of the stuff the other people say about President Bush, in tone and factual basis not as actual things. Though it is said she has talked about the assassination of her close friend of twelve years....which is funny since politically they are poles apart though on personal corruption they would be close.
2007-12-27 14:11:00 · answer #3 · answered by GunnyC 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
dont you think of the allocation of delegates for Obama is > than that or Mrs Clinton (and subsequently great delegates are applying maths fairly than parodic wins? properly without applying Flo and Mich of reason ---> yet those Democrats made mistake (the two Mrs Clinton and Obama inclusive) to disclaim those states a vote. I disagree with the certainty claimed that it grow to be Obama who stopped those states...Clinton replaced basically whilst her numbers went under Obama. Now I dont help any of the two applicants yet i inform you the reality--> rules and numbers remember(totals) it quite is the only way Mrs Clinton can win. although if Obama wins and McClain win ultimately it quite is united states of america decision --> if Mrs Clinton wins and she or he win the Elections against McClain --> you may desire to be proud additionally its united states of america people decision. (The worst component is to get a candidate to capacity who isn't chosen by applying people via vote.) in simple terms cherish any new suggestions and settle for that people vote and the totals mirror majority decision--> no longer unavoidably yours. wait and spot may be your candidate gets even a greater advantageous place to help this u . s . a . greater advantageous --> because of the fact she is so reliable. God bless usa!
2016-10-09 06:50:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
People are slowly waking up to the fact that Hillary has absolutely zero qualifications to be president other that a burning desire to be one. I would suggest president of the Ladies Auxiliary of the Book of the Month Club or possibly the ACLU.
2007-12-27 14:17:37 · answer #5 · answered by hironymus 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
wow...are you sure this is a military question? I think most of your statement is make believe.
2007-12-27 13:57:19 · answer #6 · answered by igdubya 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I thought she was neck to neck with Obama?
I did not read the rest of your vent.
2007-12-27 13:52:20 · answer #7 · answered by Stars and Stripes 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
WHOSE propaganda are you listening to, anyway? Ann Couters? Fox's?? Gus Windbag's??? Shessh! :0
2007-12-27 13:57:40 · answer #8 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
she is anti military which in my eyes she is the antichrist
2007-12-27 13:52:14 · answer #9 · answered by adasgt1981 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋