English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

23 answers

Concentration camps are for the living. Are you talking about cremation?

2007-12-27 08:24:50 · answer #1 · answered by Junk 3 · 6 0

Concentration camps aren't for disposal of bodies, they are ways of making large groups of people suffer and die.

So your question is: if we're all dead anyways, wouldn't concentration camps be a good way to handle dying?

No, they weren't cost effective, just ask the Germans.

They were also "wrong" in many ways.

Why do you ask?

Oh, I get it, you wanted to shock and offend the Jewish folks that come in here. I honestly don't think any of them would partiularly care what you have to say on the subject because you were far too obvious.

Try being more subtle if you are trying to offend.. it get's a stronger responce.

of course, I COULD be wrong, lol

2007-12-27 16:32:18 · answer #2 · answered by Deadguy71 4 · 1 0

Well, concentration camps aren't just named after the way the people died. The people were cremated, essentially, and yes, cremation is a way to dispose of a body.

Concentration camps were named so because of the concentrated number of Jews in the area, or camp.

2007-12-27 16:24:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, that would be herding or corralling. Now, building a furnace or digging a mass grave would be a good way for body disposal. I'd vote for the incinerator, though. And why does it have to be a concentration camp when the Ponderosa will do just fine.

2007-12-27 16:33:43 · answer #4 · answered by !~"Fish On"~! 5 · 0 1

First of all ARE YOU CRAZY and second of all who would run the camps if everyone is dead and third of all if everyone was dead why would we care where bodies were disposed if this is not the answer you were looking for you need to be more clear

2007-12-27 16:28:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Do you know what a concentration camp is??? People were not just burned alive or showered with toxins to rid bodies, this was a way to KILL people and to get ride of Jews and anyone who helped them. Get your facts straight before you as a question like this...

2007-12-27 16:26:38 · answer #6 · answered by RENEE915 4 · 1 0

Are you condoning the inhumane treatment that often occurs in such camps? Would you want all of your freedoms taken away and be forced to live in a barracks with others, have inadequate food, clothing, shelter, basic necessities, and contagious diseases with little medical intervention? That is like creating a law that says once a person turns 70, they must be euthanized so that they aren't a burden to others.

2007-12-27 16:26:38 · answer #7 · answered by PuttPutt 6 · 2 0

No. Multiple nukes are a good way for body disposal - instant cremation worldwide... but...

Since we are not dead yet... concentration camps are not comfortable -- and while we live, give us comfort.

2007-12-27 16:24:51 · answer #8 · answered by Ron M 2 · 0 0

who woul drun the camps if "we're all dead?" and no, they wouldnt, concentration camps are torture for the living. you need to read up on what they really are. now, mass graves, thats a no to. cause its gross. but i get where your coming from. its still not gonna be an option though

2007-12-27 16:25:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Concentration Camps are torture for the living.

2007-12-27 16:23:48 · answer #10 · answered by BILL 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers