For federal:
If you meet all the tests, you may be able to claim your 17 year old as a qualifying CHILD (he lived with you most of the year and didn't support himself--the rules are different for a QC).
if you meet different test, you may be able to claim your b/f as a qualifying relative (lived with you all year, you supported him and he made less than $3400).
Ohio uses the same criteria as federal. If you can claim them on federal, you can claim them on state. (And oddly, if your 17-year old worked, he may be able to claim himself on the state return even you claimed him on federal.)
2007-12-27 07:34:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Assuming the 17-yr old is a son or daughter or other qualifying relative and and meets the criteria, it will be one exemption. You are another exemption.
The criteria are: lived with you more than half of 2006 and did not provide half his own support. (Away at school is OK)
Whether your b/f can be claimed depends on a number of criteria that have to be satisfied:
Lived with you all year if your relationship did not violate local laws
Had gross income of less than $3,300 in 2006,
You provide over 50 percent of his support.
2007-12-27 15:46:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
VB's answer is correct.
Just on a technical point, I'm sure VB meant to type qualifying child rather than qualifying relative for your son.
2007-12-27 15:48:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by taxreff 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Get rid of that lazy *** boyfriend.
2007-12-27 16:19:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by spicertax 5
·
0⤊
1⤋