Personally, I believe he had EVERYTHING to do with it! What's your take?
2007-12-27 07:21:55 · 13 answers · asked by Lonnie P 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Okay, let's look at the players:
Musharif: stands to loose power BIG; he can't let that happen.
Al Qeda: change Pakistan from covert base of op's to OVERT base of op's.
Taliban: destabilize Pakistan; move Musharif out, move in to fill the power void.
That's who has to gain from this and everything to loose. I feel it's worth the speculation as it will influence US foreign policy.
2007-12-27 07:46:21 · update #1
Don't know. I lean towards the Taliban or Al-Qaida. Both would like nothing better to destabilize Pakistan and cause Musharif trouble as he has been less than accommodating to them. Plus, they thrive in chaos.
2007-12-27 07:27:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Oh!please stop the speculation n the pundits u-r- listening too not unless u were a fly on the wall n over heard him plot the woman's assassination than u have not a clue as to what place all u-can go by is what is being said by every news outlet in every different possible way and there own spin on it so give it a rest OK not unless u know the true facts about what happened n the news media knows it as well that is all they r doing as well speculating as to what took place.
2007-12-27 15:40:18 · answer #2 · answered by Dark Shadows 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i agree with rotor. the taliban or al queida seem more responsible because of the fact that bhutto wanted america to invade pakistan and get rid of extremism. she was a threat to their power and their beliefs.
2007-12-27 15:33:11 · answer #3 · answered by Sh00kaL00k 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Indirectly I think he did. I don't believe he had a hand personally in it but by allowing the terrosist to spread and reform in the Southern portion of the country he gave them a base of operations to work from. Like I said, I don't believe he ordered her death, but as of right now, all options are on the table for who killed her.
2007-12-27 15:30:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not very much, she was taken out by the Muslim fundamentalists who believe women have no place in politics.
And are only fit to work in the house and raise kids.
2007-12-27 16:15:23 · answer #5 · answered by conranger1 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evidence must be gathered so that Musharif will be held liable for the assassination of Bhutto.
2007-12-27 15:24:38 · answer #6 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He put up with terrorist bases in Pakistan. He was protecting them. She said "point blank" that she would eliminate terrorists. You can't figure this one out????? They took her out before she could get them! He had nothing to do with it!! USMC 60-68
2007-12-27 16:51:00 · answer #7 · answered by grizzlytrack 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He certainly had the most to gain. Further, what did Al Qaeda have to gain by killing her? Yes, very suspicious...
2007-12-27 15:25:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Completely. Musharaf is responsible.
2007-12-27 15:26:11 · answer #9 · answered by VK 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
50%
2007-12-27 15:24:36 · answer #10 · answered by ησяєєη 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋