Why don't they move?
2007-12-27 03:55:32 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
(((Nancy)))
2007-12-27 04:00:50 · update #1
They are playing freeze tag, and the Monkey that is "It" got bored and left them there.
2007-12-27 04:18:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your knowledge of evolution is lacking.
Monkeys have evolved, they went on a different branch then what man ended up on. We have all evolved differently, depending on many factors. Look at it this way, we are all individuals, we have all "evolved" differently, depending on our environment and life experiences. Why can't evolution be the same thing? After all, its had millions of years to evolve, you've only had your lifetime.
Advice, start using your common sense instead of listening to crap that doesn't use common sense.
==========
Life is so simple, but we insist on making it complicated.
Confucius
551-479 BC
==========
Peace
Jim
.
2007-12-27 12:03:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
O Monkey Monkey, who(?) bewitched
Them vs Them witch "Oppose Themselves",
with OT Law vs NT Law is as Loser vs Loser?
There is "no respect of persons with God", None;
and anything less than "never faileth" is a Fail-u-are;
And failure gets only this sign from on high: No Enter.
By the using of laws none enter and "all perish": Bible.
Yet by His Grace all enter and none perish: also Bible.
However two alls is one two many all, So pick one only.
Law <-- them-ward (let "them all" have "their end")
Grace --> "us-ward" (let "us" go on unto perfection)
Hint: the Lord is longsuffering to us-ward so none perish.
The GRACE of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen.
2007-12-27 12:22:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because we haven't killed them off yet.
I take it this is supposed to inspire responses relative to creation vs evolution. the lost ones claim that we didn't evolve from apes but rather apes and humans came from a common ancestor. nice try but that "common ancestor" would have to have had been around from at least 4 million years ago to about 40,000 years ago. having spawned many humanoid creatures one would expect that we'd have many fossils of that critter but we don't.
I do have to acknowledge scientists as having incredible faith, they cling to a theory that is based solely upon outside observation but is not supported by either the fossil record or the genome, now that's faith!
2007-12-27 12:11:40 · answer #4 · answered by Alan S 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because they like to DO IT and they make baby monkeys.
2007-12-27 12:24:02 · answer #5 · answered by traci c 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pfff, there will always be the stubborn types who stay - if nothing, then to throw poop at the others.
2007-12-27 12:00:22 · answer #6 · answered by Poppy Pickette AM - VT 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Those monkeys are dead dear. Sad I know.
2007-12-27 11:58:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Don't worry.
We're working on it.
One hectare of tropical forest at a time.
2007-12-27 11:59:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
What I want to know is how come there are still fish.
2007-12-27 12:02:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nobody has realised how good they taste yet.
Like tigers, they're nearly extinct because they taste so good.
Ever heard of the food chain
soil eats water, grass eats soil, rabbits eat grass, foxes eat rabbits, sharks eat foxes, whales eat sharks, tigers eat whales, people eat tigers, duh.
2007-12-27 12:00:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋