Prove, not conjecture : fossil formations?

Question

If in Australia, there has been found a fossilized miners hat,
and the bones of a horse that went missing on Kangaroo Island 50 years ago, that fell down a cave,
and the hypothesis is that fossils occur over millions of years,
then that has shot the theoretical discussion to peices

What say you then?
do you continue this litany of words
repeating the same so called sermon of science or
does one investigate for the truth

A) ask the pertient q's on
-evolution
B) seek out the SOURCE of the so called facts and do not go by the Litany of the knee jerking reactionists

Do Not Give Me Litany

what you quote for facts is the litany I asked you not to present to me
I asked for factual answers

fossilized ocean beds 1,000 metres above sea level in rock that is considered to be Quite young in many countries world wide
The horse fossil has quite conveniently dissapeared....
but it is common knowledge that limestone can indeed produce opalized / mineralized objects in a very short time
No one is debating the age of the earth, just the age of the fossils that you conjecture to affirm the age of the creation
1. Earth is billions of years old, God created it and then made it formless and void, due to the actions of one of His Angels
2. God started over again and hoped man would be smarter then the first self glorifying fool
Carbon Dating is not an exacting science, it's C14 is open to conjecture as to how it breaks down over time

thank you Mr Ylikaios
Sweeeeet peice of info ....
Wikipedia and Darwin prove that the conjectures are what I say they are........
Litany that gets preached to every unwary unbeleiver, who refuses to scrutinise the seemingly unending efflluent of lies

Answer 1

Don't bother. Science has no answer for the Cambrian explosion. Until the so called scientists can answer the Cambrian Explosion...there is no use in asking any further questions.

Answer 2

A Creationist saying "Do Not Give Me Litany" is the most hypocrictical person on the face of the Earth. Creationism is a litany of lies.

The requirement that fossils form slowly is a Creationist lie. I could make a fossil in the lab in weeks. I've actually pretty much done it already. I would just have to add minerals to the bath instead of resin. Most natural fossils take thousands of years and can last millions of years. Cave waters, rich in dissolved limestone are ideal for permineralization. The operative word is laboratory. I do experiments. Have you or are you just regurgitating Creationist lies as litany.

Answer 3

Neither the miner's hat nor the horse were fossilised. "Fossil" comes from the Latin "fossa" meaning stone. It is a process where living organisms are buried and their bones, sometimes the soft tissues, are replaced by stone under very particular circumstances. The miner's hat and the horse were encased in stone, which can happen to anything in a limestone cave over which water is running, but underneath the stone they were still a miner's hat and a horse. They had not become fossilised because their original material hadn't been replaced by stone.

If you took the trouble to study some basic science, you would learn about these things but it is obvious you prefer ignorance.

Answer 4

Theoretically, a miners hat could be preserved in 50 years depending on the material, the environment, air temperature, chemical compositions. Concretions can occur very quickly. Is it an actual fossil or a concretion? Mines, in particular, form concretions relatively quickly.. You need to understand that not all fossilization's are alike. Cement is rock-like and it can set form a liquid to rock-solid overnight, however cement is not a rock. Understand?

Care to cite the source?


Hmm, didn't think so.


Besides, if you have problems regarding science, posit them in the science area.

Asking this question in R&S makes you look foolish and reeks of intellectual dishonesty.

You demonstrate that your problem with geology isn’t the process itself rather that it clashes with your ideology, thus your search for answers is stifled before the question even leaves your lips.

Answer 5

oh please, how can someone so incredibly ignorant (and lacking in logic) think that they somehow have some break through that scientists are too stupid to realise.

What has how quickly a "fossil" forms (yes obviously it can happen quickly in some circumstance) got to do with the ages of all fossils????? And what does carbon 14 have to do with the age of fossils, and the age of the earth??? (not that there is anything wrong with carbon dating when used within its established limits, as it is supposed to be used).

Why don't YOU seek out a SOURCE and educate yourself about how the earth and fossils are REALLY dated. Hint: it is not because fossils take a long time to form.

What a moron.

Answer 6

Fossilization can take varying amounts of time, depending on the mineral content of the local water. Once fossilized into rock, the fossil can survive for millions of years. So no conclusions can be drawn merely from the existence of a fossil: it has to be dated, which can be done by noting the age of the rock structure which contains it, or by radiological or other means (of which there are an increasing variety available). As for evolution, it is now a proven fact; proof details are available on request. (Please provide an e-mail address.)

Answer 7

Fossils have been carbon dated to prove their age, and besides that, 50 years ago, that miner would probably have been to a dentist and it would show

Answer 8

The evolutionists just declare themselves the winners, pull up the drawbridge and refuse to debate. They are so intelligent because they evolved from slugs.

Answer 9

Are you sure of Evolution?
http://www.darwinistsneverrealize.com/
http://www.askdarwinists.com/
http://www.fossil-museum.com/
http://www.darwinism-watch.com/
http://www.evolutiondeceit.com/
http://www.evolutiondocumentary.com/
http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/
http://www.darwinismthegreatestlieinhistory.com/
http://www.whydarwinwaswrong.com/
http://www.detailsofdarwinistforgeries.com/
http://www.bewareofdarwinistfalsehoods.com/
http://www.famousdarwinistdeceptions.com/
http://www.religionofdarwinism.com/
http://www.evidencesofcreation.com/
http://www.thestoneage.org/
http://www.living-fossils.com/
http://www.evolutiontale.com/
http://www.nationalacademyofsciencesrefuted.com/
http://www.harunyahya.com/c_refutation_darwinism.php
http://www.harunyahya.com/books/darwinism/cambrian/cambrian1.php
http://www.harunyahya.com/books/darwinism/evolution_50themes/50evolution02.php
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4khUBCzmMs8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5sfHz3xyNc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-_BDLNfcOc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slJ1ZINQBfY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yv6uejxOugI