Once they approached the subject with an open mind.
I'm talking about people with a grasp of the laws of Newtonian physics, nothing fancy, just being familiar with the agreed laws of physics and mechanics.
By the way, what was the Popular Mechanics thing about? I read it, and was bemused that its physical sophistry was so clumsy.
2007-12-23 07:11:20 · 10 answers · asked by hog b 6 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Engineering
Open mind??? Is that how it leaked out? Or was it that pipe you been sucking on the last few years that did it in?
You are SOOOOOO gullible..... FOX loves you.
2007-12-23 11:27:25 · answer #1 · answered by Gary H 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The construction code used for those homes proved engineers accompanied it to the letter merely in the way the towers got here down. It replaced into precise by potential of the e book. They have been outfitted to demolish in that way if it ever got here to that and it did. I evaluate that an engineering ask your self. If code had not been accompanied the towers could have collapsed in any different case and the neighboring homes could have suffered super quantity of harm.
2016-10-02 06:56:11 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Twin Towers-has anyone spent more than an hour figuring out they were demolished by planted explosives?
If they spent 5 minutes on it it was too long, just like the time that I am spending answering this statement.
I think that you're the one practicing the sophism here.
2007-12-23 12:29:25 · answer #3 · answered by gatorbait 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Go to:
http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc__demolition_.html
Or the 9/11 commission report:
http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/index.htm
As far as people with a grasp of things Newtonian, I trust the American Society of Civil Engineers:
http://www.asce.org/responds
2007-12-23 11:01:36 · answer #4 · answered by Hate the liars and the Lies 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The truth doesn't need to be clever when it's this obvious.
Buildings hit by big planes.
Buildings burn for long time.
Steel get weak when hot.
Safety factor of design less than 2.
One floor collapse.
Loss of potential energy = gain in kinetic energy.
Kinetic energy smash next floor down.
Repeat until building destroyed.
Why is this so hard to understand?
2007-12-23 07:19:24 · answer #5 · answered by lithiumdeuteride 7 · 9⤊ 1⤋
i have seen buildings fall by demolition. I cant help but noticed more than a few similarities. That s all i will say.
2007-12-23 08:36:06 · answer #6 · answered by pandasex 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
have you seen
Zietgiest? the movie. also In Plane Site. also Loose Change 2nd cut.
check them out.
2007-12-23 08:43:13 · answer #7 · answered by Idonplay 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I thought it was done by hobbits
2007-12-23 07:52:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The conspiracy theories never cease...
2007-12-23 07:19:47 · answer #9 · answered by infidel-louie 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
? (another idiot added)
2007-12-23 12:41:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋