English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If a war takes place between Israel and all Arabs, who will win?

Israel is better in quality (technology).
Arabs are much better in quantity .. there are 22 arab countries out there. (assuming they will all unit)

It's a hypothetical question.

2007-12-23 04:30:44 · 12 answers · asked by Soraya N 1 in Politics & Government Military

12 answers

Praise be to Allaah.

Firstly: with regard to the importance of Bayt al-Maqdis (Jerusalem), you should know – may Allaah bless you –that the virtues of Bayt al-Maqdis are many:

- Allaah has described it in the Qur’aan as being blessed. He said (interpretation of the meaning): “Glorified (and Exalted) be He (Allaah) Who took His slave (Muhammad) for a journey by night from Al-Masjid Al-Haraam (at Makkah) to Al-Masjid Al-Aqsaa (in Jerusalem), the neighbourhood whereof We have blessed…” [al-Israa’ 17:1]. Al-Quds is part of the neighbourhood surrounding the mosque and hence it is blessed.

- Allaah has described it as being holy, as He says (interpretation of the meaning): “[Moosa said:] O my people! Enter the holy land (Palestine) which Allaah has assigned to you…” [al-Maa’idah 5:21]

- In al-Quds there is al-Masjid al-Aqsaa, and one prayer there is equivalent to two hundred and fifty prayers elsewhere.

It was reported that Abu Dharr (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: we were discussing, in the presence of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), which of them was more virtuous, the mosque of the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) or Bayt al-Maqdis. The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: One prayer in my mosque is better than four prayers there, but it is still a good place of prayer. Soon there will come a time when if a man has a spot of land as big as his horse’s rope from which he can see Bayt al-Maqdis, that will be better for him than the whole world. (Narrated and classed as saheeh by al-Haakim, 4/509. Al-Dhahabi and al-Albaani agreed with him, as stated in al-Silsilah al-Saheehah, at the end of the discussion of hadeeth no. 2902).

One prayer in al-Masjid al-Nabawi is equivalent to one thousand prayers elsewhere, so one prayer in al-Masjid al-Aqsaa is equivalent to two hundred and fifty prayers elsewhere.

With regard to the famous hadeeth which says that prayer in al-Masjid al-Aqsaa is equivalent to five hundred prayers elsewhere, this is da’eef (weak). (See Tamaam al-Minnah [?] by Shaykh al-Albaani – may Allaah have mercy on him – p. 292).

- The one-eyed Dajjaal (“Antichrist”) will not enter it, because of the hadeeth, “He will prevail over all the earth, apart from al-Haram [in Makkah] and Bayt al-Maqdis.” (Narrated by Ahmad, 19665. Classed as saheeh by Ibn Khuzaymah, 2/327, and Ibn Hibbaan, 7/102).

- The Dajjaal will be killed close to al-Quds. He will be killed by the Messiah ‘Eesa ibn Maryam (peace be upon him), as was stated in the hadeeth: “The son of Maryam will kill the Dajjaal at the gates of Ludd.” (Narrated by Muslim, 2937, from the hadeeth of al-Nawwaas ibn Sam’aan). Ludd (Lod) is a place near Bayt al-Maqdis.

- The Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was taken to Bayt al-Maqdis on his Night Journey (al-Israa’) from al-Masjid al-Haraam to al-Masjid al-Aqsaa. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “Glorified (and Exalted) be He (Allaah) Who took His slave (Muhammad) for a journey by night from Al-Masjid Al-Haraam (at Makkah) to Al-Masjid Al-Aqsaa (in Jerusalem)…” [al-Israa’ 17:1].

- It (al-Quds) was the first qiblah of the Muslims, as was reported by al-Baraa’ (may Allaah be pleased with him): the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) prayed in the direction of Bayt al-Maqdis for sixteen or seventeen months. (Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 41 – this version was narrated by him – and by Muslim, 525).

- It is the place where Wahy (Revelation) came down, and it is the homeland of the Prophets. This is well known.

- It is one of the mosques to which people may travel.

Abu Hurayrah (may Allaah be pleased with him) reported that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “No journey should be made except to three mosques, al-Masjid al-Haraam, Masjid al-Rasool (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and Masjid al-Aqsaa.” (Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 1132. Also narrated by Muslim, 827, from the hadeeth of Abu Sa’eed al-Khudri, with the words, “Do not travel except to…”).

- The Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) led the Prophets in one prayer in al-Aqsaa, as reported in the lengthy hadeeth: “… Then the time for prayer came, and I led them in prayer.” (Narrated by Muslim, 172, from the hadeeth of Abu Hurayrah).

It is not permissible to travel to any spot on earth for the purpose of worshipping there, except these three mosques.

Secondly:

The fact that Ya’qoob (peace be upon him) built al-Masjid al-Aqsaa does not mean that the Jews have more right to the mosque than the Muslims, because Ya’qoob was a monotheist and the Jews are mushrikeen. The fact that their father Ya’qoob built the mosque does not mean that it belongs to them. He built it for the monotheists to worship in it, even if they were not his children, and he did not allow the mushrikeen to enter it, even if they are his children, because the call of the Prophets has nothing to do with race; it is based on taqwaa (piety, awareness of Allaah).

Thirdly:

Your saying that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) led the previous Prophets in prayer to signify the unity of the message and all divine revelations is correct from the point of view of the origin of the religion and ‘aqeedah (belief) of the Prophets. All of the Prophets received their Message from one source, which was the Wahy (Revelation), and they all had the same ‘aqeedah, which was the belief in Tawheed (absolute unity of Allaah) and the worship of Allaah Alone, even though there were differences in the details of their laws. This was confirmed by our Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) when he said: “I am the closest of mankind to ‘Eesaa ibn Maryam in this world and in the Hereafter. The Prophets are brothers although they have different mothers, and their religion is one.” (Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 3259; Muslim, 2365).
The phrase “brothers although they have different mothers” means brothers who have the same father but different mothers, i.e., they are the children of co-wives.

Here we would caution readers against believing that the Jews, Christians and Muslims are following the same principles nowadays, because the Jews have changed the religion of their Prophet. Indeed, part of the religion of their Prophet is that they should follow our Prophet and not reject him, but they disbelieve in the Prophethood of Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and associate others in worship with Allaah.

Fourthly:

The Jews do not have any stake in al-Quds, because even though they may have lived in the land previously, that land now belongs to the Muslims from two points of view:

1. The Jews disbelieved and are no longer following the religion of the believers among the Children of Israel who followed and supported Moosa and ‘Eesaa (peace be upon them).

2. We Muslims have more right to it than them, because land does not belong to the people who lived there first, but to those who establish the laws of Allaah therein. Allaah created the land, and He created people to worship Allaah in the land and to establish therein the religion, laws and rulings of Allaah. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “… Verily, the earth is Allaah’s. He gives it as a heritage to whom He wills of His slaves; and the (blessed) end is for the Muttaqoon (the pious).” [al-A’raaf 7:128]

Hence if some Arabs came who were not followers of Islam and they ruled the land with kufr, they would have to be fought until they submitted to the rule of Islam or were killed.

It is not the matter of race or ethnicity; it is the matter of Tawheed and Islam.

Here it is useful to quote the words of one of the researchers:

“History tells us that the first people to settle in Palestine were the Canaanites, six thousand years BCE. They were an Arab tribe who came to Palestine from the Arabian Peninsula, and after their arrival, Palestine was named after them [i.e., Canaan].”

(al-Suhyooniyyah, Nash’atuhaa, Tanzeemaatuhaa, Inshitatuhaa, by Ahmad al-‘Awadi, p. 7).

“As for the Jews, the first time they entered Palestine was approximately six hundred years after Ibraheem had entered the land, i.e., they entered it approximately 1400 years BCE. So the Canaanites entered Palestine and lived there approximately 4500 years before the Jews.”

(Ibid., p. 8)

Hence it is clear that the Jews have no right to the land, whether according to religious law or in terms of who lived there first and possessed the land. They are aggressors who are seizing the land by force. We ask Allaah to rid Bayt al-Maqdis of them sooner rather than later, for He is Able to do that and He is Most Generous in answering. Praise be to Allaah, the Lord of the Worlds.

Islam Q&A
Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid

2007-12-27 13:09:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Israel may win not just because it is a stronger country and has a better technology. The thing is not about quantity, if you look at some arab countries, some of them will help Israel and not their countries that is because they are scared of the US, it will destroy their economy, it won't support them any more. Israel won in 1967 because the Jordanian president at that time went to Israel and told them that Arab will make a war against Israel.
However, if you look at Lebanon there was a war in August 2006 and Lebanon won after a war of 33 days. The government and the army in Israel were and still in a very big trouble.

2007-12-23 04:49:10 · answer #2 · answered by Smart Ambitious 2 · 0 0

Of course Israel are best in entire world in term of planing and modifying weapon better then American, very good reserves, Important only middle east country to have Nukes and IRBM,

6 day war is different story, but even in 1973 Yom Kippur War, when Egypt and Syria surprise attack they manage to over come in 48 hrs, then war change to Israel favor.

Israel has Better technology then any other because they self develop the system and frequently changing the technology,
but Arab mainly live in import the weapon which update after long interval.

If Arab want to win a war, they should do some important things:

They need Nukes,
One better technology weapon,
Better Air force,
Good Spy,
Unity with them &
No US support for Israel.

2007-12-23 04:59:18 · answer #3 · answered by nmkmathan 3 · 0 0

Israel will win because it will have the advantage of the US's unconditional support
and as u mentioned in your question it's highly unlikely the 22 Arab countries will unit in a war against Israel because they have many conflicts already. And that was the case in the pervious wars between Arabs and Israel.

2007-12-23 05:18:15 · answer #4 · answered by honey9 1 · 0 0

This conflict is going way deeper than you're conscious. To get a carry close you want some background and hear some arab television, and then weigh it out. The question you actual ought to respond to is why in this earth are we there after that's it precise and then how can you help exchange this occasion. right this is a certainty you will possibly not comprehend There are sufficient American tax dollar given to Israel annualy that if we'd have loved to that money ought to supply each and every American spectacular well being care.

2016-10-02 06:52:10 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Isreal is believed to be one the best trained military powers in the world. But not too long ago they had a little bit of trouble with Hezbolla. They had not released the hounds on them totally but were showed that even the smaller level terrorists groups were to be a challenge. If as stated in the question that all arab countries came together they would not stand a chance until the US stepped in.

2007-12-23 04:45:28 · answer #6 · answered by dustynmill 2 · 0 0

This already happened. There was the 6-day War in 1967 where numerous arab countries attacked Israel, and Israel was victourious in only 6 days.

2007-12-23 04:35:40 · answer #7 · answered by itz631 3 · 1 2

Israel = 200 plus nukes.

Arabs = NO nukes.

Figure it out yourself, the Arabs have.

(Pakistan is NOT an Arab nation just in case you are confused.)

2007-12-24 16:55:37 · answer #8 · answered by forgivebutdonotforget911 6 · 0 0

Yeah it did already happen and the Isrealies mopped the floor with them and would do the exact same thing. Every man or women in Isreal is automatically in the military at age 18, at least i believe so. if i am wrong dont be scarred to email me and correct me.

2007-12-23 17:39:17 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Israel has faced that situation before: in 1948 (without technical superiority), 1956, 1967, and 1973.

Israel has always won, because it had to; if Israel were to be defeated, it would cease to exist.

2007-12-23 04:43:10 · answer #10 · answered by wichitaor1 7 · 0 2

Israel have enough nuclear bombs from USA to bomb the entire world 20 times over, who do you think?

2007-12-27 22:38:23 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers