English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

Mass immigration does not help the UK economy and we would have more space , cheaper housing (perhaps30% cheaper) and English speaking schools. Also the lower population would be sustainable and not pose a long term danger because this island is not big enough for the projected 80,000,000 people soon to inhabit the UK

2007-12-23 02:34:02 · answer #1 · answered by Simon600 6 · 5 4

Yep, if people want to fanny on about that culture crap, there's the EuroStar that takes you into Europe and back, so use it instead of opening the floodgates.

I'm all for restricted immigration but when the "culture" card gets thrown about it makes no sense when you can drive, fly or sail to the European mainland.

Oh, and to the Captain, I work in the NHS so that must make me an immigrant! :roles eyes:, can't beat a bit of scaremongering eh Cap? Get rid of the immigrants and get the jobless to fill those posts, goodbye immigrants hello NHS.

2007-12-24 04:45:25 · answer #2 · answered by tom_p1980 4 · 2 1

No. There is no 'mass immigration'. This is just a myth. We have always had immigration. It's higher than usual now because of the new EU countries, but this doesn't happen every year.

Immigrants bring decency and respect back to Britain. The ones I've met are kind and honest. Can't say the same for many Brits!

2007-12-23 12:56:49 · answer #3 · answered by thingy 4 · 4 4

No.

Immigration has brought problems and only a fool would say that there are none, but it has also brought about huge benefits. And again, only a fool would deny that. Remember this is a nation of immigration. The Royal Family is based on immigration, Prince Charles is the son of an immigrant. The NHS is dependent on immigration to survive. http://www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/Content/immigrationinternational?OpenDocument&Highlight=2,overseas%20 Get rid of immigration and get rid of our NHS.

2007-12-23 13:14:24 · answer #4 · answered by The Patriot 7 · 4 3

If we the white majority "at the moment" where allowed to aswser your question. openly (standing on a soap box as old) without all the racial laws, I am sure that 99% would vote "RATHER NOT,,,

2007-12-24 05:59:42 · answer #5 · answered by plumbjobby 2 · 2 1

no matter what the 'racist accusers' and the wet liberals tell you, the fact is that immigration on this scale has been a labour party miscalculation.(one of many) and it is draining the country at such a fast rate! that if its not stopped, we will be destroyed both financially and culturally within 10 years. the problem is , we are up against a government that will not admit its mistakes for fear of losing popularity. and doesn't seem to realise that immigration has destroyed any chance of them ever being elected again. so they will go on for the next two years doing irreversable damage. and destroying Britain. i cant understand why we have such a stupid political format where we cant remove disasterouse political parties untill their time is up. why should the British public have to sit for the next two years KNOWING that every month, the labour party are achieving more and more ireversable damage. its complete insanity.

2007-12-23 12:03:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6 5

This is yet another BNP inspired spam type question. If the BNP really have a case they would not have to try to recruit desperately so much via the internet.
And no, we don't have 'mass immigration', far too emotive a term, just a few newcomers who fill gaps in the labour market and work hard and pay their taxes to support themselves and their families.

2007-12-23 12:28:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 6

Kick the feckers out!

2007-12-24 10:51:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Too right. i agree with Rommel

2007-12-25 07:01:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I would rather a UK without some xenophobic ranters really

2007-12-23 13:15:27 · answer #10 · answered by BUST TO UTOPIA 6 · 3 4

fedest.com, questions and answers