English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

my brother has two cameras one is 5 megapixel the other is 12 megapixel and I see no difference between them?

2007-12-21 15:29:55 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Consumer Electronics Cameras

7 answers

also at this time Dr.sam answered the question completely but maybe I can explain this to a non-professional peson better.......at a certain physical size of a picture maybe u will not notice that there is a difference but for huge prined picture u will find that there is a difference because it is compose of more pixels....

2007-12-21 15:49:29 · answer #1 · answered by mohd s 2 · 0 0

It's because, in reality, there isn't a big difference between 5 and 12 megapixels. That's the total number of pixels in a picture, which you get by multiplying the vertical resolution by the horizontal resolution. So, the 12 megapixel camera only has about 55% more pixels in each dimension, which isn't a big improvement.

2007-12-21 15:45:54 · answer #2 · answered by Wombat 4 · 0 0

If you always plan and compose your pictures perfectly, you don't need a whole lot of pixels. These days, I'd say that 5 MP or even 4 MP is fine for the average snapshooter and this can be obtained without unreasonable expense. If you want to allow for cropping, which means enlarging only a portion of your image, the more pixels the better.

Imagine taking a scenic view and then noticing that the middle 20% of the photo would make an even better picture. Suppose you take a picture of a whole group of people and Aunt Clara really, really looks great in the picture, but everyone else looks lousy. If you have the pixels to work with, you can still make a decent print of Aunt Clara that she would be happy to have. If you buy an 8-to-10 MP camera and don't want to TAKE large photos, you can always set the camera to a lower file size. You can never go the other direction, though. Unless the cost is a major issue, buy the camera with more pixels. You will never be sorry that you did, but you might one day be sorry that you didn't.

I have a few photos on Flickr to include in a discussion on how many pixels are enough. Go to my page at http://www.flickr.com/photos/samfeinstein/tags/pixels/ Some of the pictures are from a 4 MP or even 3 MP camera, showing you what you might expect without any cropping. I think they are quite acceptable. Some of the pictures are from a 10 MP camera (the swan and the pansies), showing the value of having those large images so that you can crop a smaller image out of the original picture and still end up with a satisfactory image. There is one VGA picture, just to show what you could expect from 640 x 480 pixels - not much.

Ken Rockwell has an interesting article on pixels and the pixel wars: http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth.htm

Having said all that, though, pixels are not the only measure of image quality. The sensor size is important as well as the image processing software included in the camera. (See http://www.flickr.com/photos/7189769@N04/476181751/
You need to read reviews if you want a critical understanding of image quality for particular cameras. Try http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/ for more information on the cameras you are considering. Pixels are not the decision maker, but they are the tie breaker, so go for the higher pixel count.

You can go there and click on "Buying Guide" and then "Features Search" to specify how many pixels you want to look at.

You can also go to http://www.steves-digicams.com/default.htm and click on "Our reviews," where you will find catagories of cameras arranged by pixel count.

2007-12-21 15:32:55 · answer #3 · answered by Picture Taker 7 · 2 0

You will see the difference only at a large print, say 19x13. And keep in mind, that more megapixels don't necessarily mean better picture quality.

2007-12-21 16:57:50 · answer #4 · answered by gklein57 1 · 0 0

in addition to the other great answers, I'd just like to add that if you take an image,and just want a small section of that picture, you'll lose a lot of quality when you crop it. If you want to keep that quality, a larger MP camera is better.

2007-12-21 15:42:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I LEARNED THAT RESOLUTION IS THE KEY...I SPENT HOURS ZOOMING, CROPPING, TOUCHING UP SO MANY FAMILY PHOTOS TO MAKE PHOTO GIFTS LIKE POSTERS, ETC. I WENT TO PICK UP MY ORDER ( I UPLOADED TO WALMART PHOTO CENTER ONLINE) AND THEY ALL CAME OUT BLURRY ALTHOUGH THEY LOOKED FINE WHEN I VIEWED THEM ON THE SCREEN ...

2007-12-21 15:34:38 · answer #6 · answered by cdlfamilyof4 3 · 1 1

if you zoomed it you could tell one would get blurry faster.. .yes it's true no difference at full size

2007-12-21 15:32:10 · answer #7 · answered by Brad R 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers