To have any thing done,there must be a subject to do it.Anyone cann't even drink without lifting a cup of water to his mouth.How come the whole world has no creator?
2007-12-21 07:56:06 · 33 answers · asked by Humanist A.R.T. 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
uh...i didnt understand anything til your last line.
its simple...because if theworld has a creator...then who created the creator?
if you say that the creator has no creator...then i say the universe has no creator. its a logical stalemate.
2007-12-21 07:58:12 · answer #1 · answered by johnny.zondo 6 · 9⤊ 2⤋
How can the world exist without a creator, is that your question?
I find it easier to trust a scientific explanation that might be flawed over the "you just have to have faith" alternative.
Study the big bang theory and the theory of evolution. Do it from a stand point of learning instead of from a preconceived notion that it doesn't fit into the biblical creation story. You could really learn something.
2007-12-21 08:04:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Interesting post, I'll give you that.
My argument would be that you're using a linguistic rule to attempt to prove a supernatural entity, which is just strange.
If you're saying that the universe must have an explanation, I'd argue that the existence of some contingent things IN the universe can't be used to conclude the universe itself requires an explanation.
2007-12-21 08:01:46 · answer #3 · answered by Eleventy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because the natural forces at play in the cosmos are sufficient to build a world (a solar system, a galaxy, a universe) without the intervention of an anthropomorphic invisible sky pixie.
2007-12-21 08:01:18 · answer #4 · answered by John R 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
"Radiate"; radioactivity has not been shown to have any efficient cause, it is simply the nature of the the thing to decay in this manner. This one example means insisting on a cause/effect relationship even within the universe is not necessary - each case must be considered individually. Thus, it seems less reasonable to assume the universe has a cause.
2007-12-21 08:05:30 · answer #5 · answered by neil s 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So I guess that God created the concept of "verbs" now. Pretty sure that was the "Brits". The world has no creator because it doesn't. Is that simple enough for you to understand.
2007-12-21 08:03:54 · answer #6 · answered by Blame Amy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're attempting to "prove" a creator by arguing Western linguistics? Why not first try to establish that the Universe wasn't formed by a pink unicorn. Prove that didn't happen, and we'll talk linguistics.
2007-12-21 07:58:56 · answer #7 · answered by Blackacre 7 · 7⤊ 0⤋
I don't have a belief in gods. That doesn't mean I possess any special knowledge about the origins of the universe or life.
2007-12-21 08:00:21 · answer #8 · answered by Let Me Think 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Interesting hypothesis! So when it rains, God is directly involved in making the water fall? If two large bodies in space grow closer or orbit each other because of gravity, God is personally directing their movement? And water flows downhill because God pushes it?
2007-12-21 07:59:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
That subject doesn't have to be a conscious being. Masses collide and supernovas occur, that doesn't mean an invisible spirit god causes them.
2007-12-22 11:40:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, you might say, "If there's a world, then there must be a G-d who created it." But then it would follow, "If there's a G-d, there must be a G-d who created that G-d." And where does that get you?
2007-12-21 08:05:44 · answer #11 · answered by yutsnark 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋