I'm buying a TV this evening. I'm torn between a 32 inch JVC and a 32 inch Panasonic (about $100 difference in cost). My question is about the service contract. 4 year contract is $100. I usually get contracts on portable stuff, but am wondering if it is worth getting it on an LCD? Are they fairly reliable? Am I wasting the money or is it a waste not to get it? Thanks!
2007-12-21 07:47:50 · 4 answers · asked by CarbonDated 7 in Consumer Electronics ➔ TVs
At $25 per year, it's not that bad. It's a sure way to protect your expensive investment. No headaches.
2007-12-21 08:00:19 · answer #1 · answered by Neil N 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely worth it! You don't want to spend a lot of money on a TV to have it break down and have to pay a lot more to fix it. Plus most TV service contracts come to your house, which is convenient because you don't have to move the TV or anything. I usually get a service contract for any major electronic item I buy.
2007-12-21 16:22:29 · answer #2 · answered by garionorb1976 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
nope.
got a Vizio in December.
And they service contract does not warrent or do well at all
the TV is guaranteed to operate for 22,000 hours.
In the past have you ever had an issue with a TV set,.
Keep the money for a party and have the family over to watch the sueprbowl.
Mc
2007-12-21 16:22:13 · answer #3 · answered by Michael M 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
LCDs are reliable but you should always get a warrenty, if you are buying from currys i would get the longest warrenty available because anything can happen and there warrenty covers everythings exept theft and purposeful damage.
2007-12-21 15:59:29 · answer #4 · answered by Mysterious Stranger 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋