With all of the charges of cover ups and lies that seem to be leading to the White House regarding our reasons for Iraq, the tapes of the U.S. intelligence torturing individuals; do you think that if evidence supports those charges... we should considering putting them on trail in The Hague?
Inflamatory rhetoric, regardless of position is not welcome.
Well thought out and concise answers please.
2007-12-21 07:08:10 · 22 answers · asked by SPMOSHER 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Regarding Dick - from Resolution HR 333
Resolution HR 333 contains three articles, the first two holding Cheney responsible for manipulating intelligence to fabricate a threat of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and allege a relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda, in order to justify the use of the United States Armed Forces against Iraq.
The third article alleges that Cheney has threatened aggression against Iran despite the absence of any real threat from Iran, thus undermining the national security of the US.
2007-12-21 07:59:13 · update #1
YES.
(VICG) Iraqui Veterans against war said that tortures against prisioners are a sistematic practice in Iraq.
Human Right Wash said that weapons used in Iraq by USA forces are illegal.
A BBC investigation can reveal that the US and UK military have continued to use depleted uranium weapons despite warnings from scientists that it poses a potential long-term cancer risk to civilians.
Bush confessed to war crimes. Nicolas J S Davies, Online Journal Contributing Writer. Sep 11, 2006, 00:31
George W. Bush's speech on September 6 amounted to a public confession to criminal violations of the 1996 War Crimes Act. He implicitly admitted authorizing disappearances, extrajudicial imprisonment, torture, transporting prisoners between countries and denying the International Committee of the Red Cross access to prisoners.
RAI, Italian news has said the Bush used quimical weapons against civilian population in Falluyah
The many brutal crimes committed by Bush et al re Iraq were unconscionable. A large number of individuals in the news media, Congress, and law enforcement have heard of some of the documented incriminating facts contained herein, but have not fully investigated their criminal connections. The failure of the media, Congress, and law enforcement to fully investigate, and disclose the eye-witnessed factual evidence of those criminal acts to the American public is almost equally unconscionable.
2007-12-21 14:13:14 · answer #1 · answered by ana b 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
1
2016-06-12 04:37:49 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Every administration at least since world war 2 could be tried for crimes that we hung people for at Nuremberg.
2016-05-25 08:09:03 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, they havent really commited anything that would make them war criminals under international law. Most of the things they authorized that would be a violation of said law, the US never signed into law, so we are not under it. They would be heald responsible at home for lies, if indeed they do exsist (im not saying one ay or another). You have to remember, this is not a normal time with a normal war. Extraordinary enemys require extraordinary tactics.
2007-12-21 07:13:50 · answer #4 · answered by cheechalini 4 · 9⤊ 1⤋
If you can quote a law that was broken and supply probable cause - lets hear it.
Otherwise your question is nothing more than the empty rhetoric you claim to want to avoid.
2007-12-21 07:49:14 · answer #5 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Yes. Bush and his cadre of thugs, liars and terrorists should be dragged before the World Court in The Hague and tried for crimes against humanity......
Then, put on trial in our country for high crime, misdemeanors and treason.
2007-12-21 09:13:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
No, you should be put on trial for being worthless.
Do you seriously think that GW is the only president to do things that needed to be covered up? I am for whatever the government needs to do to keep my family and me safe.
2007-12-21 07:13:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
is this question going to be posted beyond the election?
in the words of your supporters during clinton "move on".
2007-12-21 08:50:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I will think out my answer to the degree you thought out your question.
A long answer would be.....NO
A short answer would be ....to indite anyone who supported the resolution to go to war along with them.
2007-12-21 07:57:22 · answer #9 · answered by igdubya 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Please just shut up until you can present proof, you lefty tards do know what PROOF is, right?
Reminder to left wing idiots on Y!A, "I hate Bush" is not a war crime nor is it impeachable. So do us all a favor, shut up or post proof of crimes that can be used in a trial.
2007-12-21 07:14:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 2⤋