No, the Scrupture actually states that the number of the beast is "six hundred and sixty-six"...not three instances of six.
What you are talking about is more akin to "6 and 6 and 6".
That's the difference.
2007-12-21 04:38:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Antioch 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Don't worry, It was a translation error anyways.
Supposedly the real number is 616.
But by the time they'd realized the mistake it was too late
(aka: expensive) to correct it.
Same with Reed Sea been mistranslated as Red Sea.
Personally I prefer the 666 version better, because thats the area code for my country's Government, and thats just plain funny.
2007-12-21 04:49:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hey 666 is the number of the beast!! but it has nothing to do with ur name buddy!
dont worry abt it and the more u think abt it the more freaked out u wil be.
pls do not take this seriously co if u go to thinking abt it and the number..then u will eventually be letting the demon play riot in ur mind!! it is not superstitious....the number is true.
but y do u have to care??
My grandma is born on the 13th! but she no care.its just a number. do not get this confused with the number of the beast now okay!!..just forget abt it and be happy u have a long name anda nice one! it duzn matter if u have 12 letters in each of them! ha ha.
Take care. ;)
2007-12-21 04:41:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Marki 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It`s not something you should be afraid . If your name in a Gematria system would have given you 666 , well thats a reason.
And there are a lot of people with 3 names of 6 letters .
2007-12-21 04:38:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It only works with names that use numbers for some of the letters such as Roman numerals. A key blasphemous title of the pope during the dark ages was "vicarius filii dei" (vicar of God) v (5) + i (1) +c (100) + i (1) + u (5) + i (1) + l (50) + i (1) + i (1) + d (500)+ i (1) = 666
2016-04-10 11:28:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's what people were saying 27 years ago with Ronald Wilson Reagan. And countless other people throughout history. It doesn't mean anything.
"666" is just the numerological value for "Nero". Revelations 13 is really just a political rant told through symbolism.
2007-12-21 04:36:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
NONE CONSIDER THE BIBLE PROPHECY OF DANIEL, JESUS & JOHN????
No German Nation Hitler came before you.
No one man before or after him has done as bad as he did Rev.13:1-5,6-10 WW1, Rev.13:11-18 [ mans wisdom for the 666 that is in between the prophecy given ]; On Judgement day will German Nation Hitler 666 please step forth, [ Heb.9:27; 2Cor.5:10 ], Hitler marked millions for death with no escape.
At yr 3460, Daniel gives 2520 years to Dan.12:1-13 [ Michael in the time of the end, Rev.12:3,4,6-11,12; Michael, THE WORD and Satan's short time in the time of the end, [ Jesus & THE WORD Matt.13:37-39; 24:3, 7,14, 15,21, 22,36-39; 25:31-34 ]; now at 2007 after Jesus was in Rome world Empire #6, now is 2613 years after Daniel and all captived, Judah king [ end at Babylon world Empire #3, 606 B. C ], now is 62 years after WW2 and the holocaust, the bible has been in circulation in the world [ now there are many translations ], 396 years.
Bible was age 303 years at WW1. 2520 years after Daniel's prophecy.
Bible was age 334 at end of WW2 and holocaust. Man wisdom between.
Bible was age 363 at end of Vietnam conflict. 2580 years after Daniel.
Bible is age 380,391 [ prophecy 2608], 396 at Euphrates area conflict.
Dan.12:1-12 [ 2x 1335 = ] 2670 less 2520 is 150 less 93 yrs has passed.
Present time is now at 2613 after Babylon world Empire #3, ended Judah kings, THERE WILL BE NO KING UNTIL JESUS AT HIS SECOND COMING.
Eph.2:7; 3:21; The world with Jesus is without end. John 3:!6; 17:3,17; 2Pet.3:13: 1Cor.15:22-28,51-53; Rev.20:1-6,12,13; Rev.21:1-5; All is made as new as before Eden.
2007-12-21 04:54:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by jeni 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Your probably like the 200000900394093...th person to ever have this coincidence in your name.
2007-12-21 04:35:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Small Victories 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Didn't hurt Ronald Reagan.
2007-12-21 04:38:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anna P 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Don't worry. A Vatican hit squad has been dispatched to take care of , err, I mean help, you.
2007-12-21 04:39:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋