True or False: Our perception of Reality is determined by what we believe?

Answer 1

False.

Our perception of Reality is determined by our senses and our brain's capacity to analyse the data.

This leads to interpretation. Interpretation will always be flawed.

Answer 2

MATTER: The Other Name for Illusion

What is explained in this book is an important truth, which has surprised many and changed their perspectives on life. This truth can be summarized as follows: "All events and objects that we encounter in real life-buildings, people, cities, cars, places-in fact, everything we see, hold, touch, smell, taste and hear-come into existence as visions and feelings in our brains".

We are taught to think that these images and feelings are caused by a solid world outside of our brains, where material things exist. However, in reality we never see real existing materials and we never touch real materials. In other words, every material entity which we believe exists in our lives, is, in fact, only a vision which is created in our brains.

This is not a philosophical speculation. It is an empirical fact that has been proven by modern science. Today, any scientist who is a specialist in medicine, biology, neurology or any other field related to brain research would say, when asked how and where we see the world, that we see the whole world in the vision center located in our brains.

This fact has been scientifically proven in the twentieth century, and although it may seem surprising, it necessarily implies answers to two questions; "If our lives are visions created in our brains, then who is it that creates these visions? And who is it that sees these visions in our brains without having eyes and enjoys them, gets excited and happy?" You will find the answers to these two important questions in this book.
http://www.harunyahya.com/matter.php

Answer 3

Makes sense to me.

But perception doesn't dictate reality.

I might think I can fly, but when I actually test and try to measure that belief, I will end up a crumpled mess at the base of a building.

That is why science is more reliable than religion for belief.

Answer 4

Vice Versa.

Answer 5

3 does no longer persist with. the certainty that it is available that incorrect recommendations are conducive to survival, does no longer make it inevitably the case. you may prefer to a minimum of one at a time set up that precise recommendations are truthfully inimical to survival and erroneous recommendations advantageous. to speak on your occasion of an animal that thinks "each sound in the night is a predator" - it is barely a case the place erroneous recommendations basically fail to evade survival. you may desire to argue that the animal is dropping capability responding to fake positives, and consequently is at an evolutionary disadvantage to animals with a extra precise danger detection heuristic. added, there seems to be a tacit assumption that if the recommendations could desire to be infallible, in the different case no human concept could properly be seen precise. in any different case #4 does no longer persist with from #3. that may no longer the case, as a human recommendations is able to being incorrect, yet in addition could carry some real ideals besides.

Answer 6

True: reality is relative to the perceiver.

Answer 7

True Reality is different from person to person

Answer 8

we can never see the "true reality"(atleast... not yet)
and true... but what we believed is first determined what we first perceived

Answer 9

False. That question can never be true under any circumstances.

Answer 10

true....duh