When the temperatures stopped going up after 1998. Since the climate wasn't warming, global warming only cause the cause to be ridiculed. By calling it climate change, then they always have something to whine about since the climate is always changing. There is no such thing as a static climate.
2007-12-21 02:20:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dr Jello 7
·
6⤊
1⤋
It didn't. Global warming and climate change are related, but are not the same thing.
Global warming means any increase in the planet's mean temperature. Climate change means any long term change in average weather patterns. So you can think of climate change as resulting form global warming.
Unfortunately, the media seems blissfully unaware of this fact, and often uses the terms interchangeably.
2007-12-21 02:17:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by SomeGuy 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
The Bush administration paid a political representative Frank Luntz to verify the effect of words and terminology. Luntz chanced on that the time period "climate replace" became regularly happening as a average view by the favourite public at the same time as the time period "international Warming" became seen as an extremist view factor. So the Bush administration used "climate replace" with the intention to down play international warming. The time period became presented to defuse concerns over international warming. the version between the international cooling concerns of the 70's and the present international warming concerns is information. the information became incomplete interior the 70's and far of the outcomes stated has been attributed to international dimming which grew to change into glaring at the same time as 9/11 cleared the skies of contrails. that's sparkling that international dimming has been protecting international warming for decades. Arguably the information remains incomplete yet a lengthy way extra finished then interior the 70's.
2016-10-19 22:09:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It didn't. Here's what I mean:
First, note that the "skeptics" have tried to make a big deal of the fact that (supposedly) scientists "first said there wasglobal warming and then 'changed' it to climate change."
That is not correct. Global warming is simply a rise in the Earth's average temperature. In the case of the current global warming, it is primarily caused by human activity. Climate change refers to the EFFECTS of global warming. That is, to events such as polar ice melting, increased numbers of floods, droughts, storms, etc.
The language used descrives a case-and-effect relationship,as follows: human action (cause)---global warming (effect and intermediate cause) --- climate change (effect).
Thus, in making an issue about "scientists changing from global warming to climate chane" the "skeptics" are only managing to show they are so completely ignorant of the science they don't even know the definitions of the terms being used.
2007-12-21 03:53:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
Visit ClimateAds.com to help global warming. You can add a HTML code to your website or social network profile (myspace) to raise awareness of how to prevent global warming.
http://ClimateAds.com
2007-12-21 11:50:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by peter s 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
variety of issues are often raised in relation to global warming. One is ocean acidification. Increased atmospheric CO2 increases the amount of CO2 dissolved in the oceans.[94] CO2 dissolved in the ocean reacts with water to form carbonic acid, resulting in acidification. Ocean surface pH is estimated to have decreased from 8.25 near the beginning of the industrial era to 8.14 by 2004,[95] and is projected to decrease by a further 0.14 to 0.5 units by 2100 as the ocean absorbs more CO2.[1][96] Since organisms and ecosystems are adapted to a narrow range of pH, this raises extinction concerns, directly driven by increased atmospheric CO2, that could disrupt food webs and impact human societies that depend on marine ecosystem services.[97]
Global dimming, the gradual reduction in the amount of global direct irradiance at the Earth's surface, may have partially mitigated global warming in the late twentieth century. From 1960 to 1990 human-caused aerosols likely precipitated this effect. Scientists have stated with 66–90% confidence that the effects of human-caused aerosols, along with volcanic activity, have offset some of the global warming, and that greenhouse gases would have resulted in more warming than observed if not for these dimming agents.[1]
Ozone depletion, the steady decline in the total amount of ozone in Earth's stratosphere, is frequently cited in relation to global warming. Although there are areas of linkage, the relationship between the two is not strong.
2007-12-21 02:18:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by krazzzykevin 1
·
1⤊
3⤋
The two words mean the same thing.
If you look around the world you will see every country is experencing some awful global changes wether it be cold or hot
Global = world wide
Climate = changes in weather
2007-12-21 02:20:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by cally l 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
global warming and climate change is the same thing
2007-12-21 02:24:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Gases go to the atmosphere. Heat rays comes from the sun, reflect off the ground and reflect off the gases, so they keep reflecting till there's no heat left to transfer, so the planet gets warmer. This creates heat waves that makes water evaporate faster and the polar ice caps melt. Also, the newly created hot air current combined w/ the arctic and antarctic cold air current creates tornadoes.
2007-12-21 02:18:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Temennigru 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
Because in order for the liberals to be able to cover their butt whenever there's a change in the cooling direction, they now call it global climate change. That way, hotter, colder, it doesn't matter, they're covered. Great question.
2007-12-21 02:17:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mr Rational 4
·
7⤊
3⤋