2007-12-18 13:58:28 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
nha .. i think after several weeks of exposure people would get used to the style ..
2007-12-18 14:02:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
In the geographical location, and in the culture he functioned in, the population wore robes. They provided the opportunity for greater ventilation to the unexposed anatomy, which helped keep the individual cooler. Do you find it offensive for these people to wear robes? If so, why?
2007-12-18 22:07:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Neither did Julius Cesar or Alexander the Great. hmmmm, maybe I'll stop wearing pants and hope to turn out like one of those three.
2007-12-18 22:03:01 · answer #3 · answered by Phil K 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
It is amazing how ignorant some "dress reformers" can be about the history of dress. I am told that in Moses day also, the dress was quite uniform. No, I don't find it "offensive"
2007-12-18 22:05:05 · answer #4 · answered by hasse_john 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Francine,
Stay in the USA. You may not get along well outside of your own community. There are people everywhere that dress differently than you do. Have a great week.
Thanks,
Eds
.
2007-12-18 22:02:18 · answer #5 · answered by Eds 7 · 7⤊ 0⤋
No one wore pants back then, they had not been invented yet
2007-12-18 22:11:05 · answer #6 · answered by tebone0315 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The lack of pants I don't mind. It's that he had an erection half the time!
2007-12-18 22:23:31 · answer #7 · answered by Sabrina H 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
you women must have, you all walk around with nothing on but a string and an eye patch, must be your womens lib.
2007-12-18 22:03:53 · answer #8 · answered by technician68 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, but someday every knee shall bow and tongue confess that Jesus is Lord.
2007-12-18 22:01:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Ehh.
That's one aspect of religion I prefer not to consider, KayThanks.
:]
2007-12-18 22:03:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋