Because The Second Amendment was repealed or found, by The Supreme Court, not to be an individual right of the people.?
2007-12-18 13:46:48 · 15 answers · asked by ? 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
Wonderful answers as usual.
2007-12-18 15:22:07 · update #1
I'm with STEVENF on this one and I did take that oth. Luckily my boss is even more progun then I am so I don't see it happening {the order not the change by the court}. Personnaly I think you would see a new civil war here and I'm sorry but I have some vacation time to use right now.
2007-12-19 04:39:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't know about police, but all military take and oath to "Uphold and defend the Constitution" against ALL enemies, both foreign and domestic. If the Supreme Court ruled the second amendment did not protect an INDIVIDUAL right, they would meet MY definition of an enemy of the Constitution. An EXTREMELY large number of gun owners would agree. A wide spread effort of confiscate guns would likely trigger the next American Revolution.
2007-12-18 14:26:27 · answer #2 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The smarter difficulty to do is to take weapons from the criminal yet that isn't as hassle-free as making a regulation to take them far flung from those that save on with the regulation in the 1st place.I would desire to believe Dr.Awkward whether through fact options and shovels and bows and arrows have been no thank you to combat weapons and cannon.it would have evened the percentages. human beings merely % to proceed to exist and stay their existence in freedom. Gun possession is a responsiblity and human beings possessing weapons for the superb reason and their Constitional rights know that. Our forefathers have been clever adult adult males the time in background would have been diverse yet cases are an identical.
2016-10-08 21:40:55 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Historically, police have always been willing to confiscate guns. In cities where handguns were outlawed, like Chicago or Washington D.C. there is not a singe case of a police officer refusing to confiscate a gun.
2007-12-18 18:05:04 · answer #4 · answered by Jack Flanders 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The document I hold dear is the U.S. constitution and just because modern day politicians like Ted Kennedy declare something "illegal", it doesn't erase what was written in the constitution and that's the only true law...Only a strait up crook with an agenda can read something else out of THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BARE ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED..
2007-12-18 14:19:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
They won't wait for that:
Yahoo won't let me post a link to an incident in LA after Katrina where guns were confiscated from law abiding citizens.
2007-12-18 13:53:47 · answer #6 · answered by Jason 6 · 7⤊ 1⤋
NEW LAW PROPOSED IN ALABAMA THIS WEEK--ALL STUDENTS SHOULD BE ALLOWED ON COLLEGE CAMPUS TO CARRY A WEAPON FOR SELF PROTECTION IF THEY SO DESIRE TO DO SO?
SOCIETY IS SICK OF BEING POUNDED UPON BY INDIVIDUALS WHO CAN PREY UPON SOMEONE. THINK THE TREND WILL BE MORE TOWARDS ARMING THEN DISARMING.
2007-12-18 14:20:25 · answer #7 · answered by ahsoasho2u2 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Nope.
2007-12-18 13:49:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not a cop but I don't know one that would and I know a few of them here
2007-12-18 13:49:06 · answer #9 · answered by ja man 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
guns, what guns. I couldn't find any in his house sir. he must have sold them. well thankyou sir. you have a good day. (psst. you better hide the ammo too).
2007-12-18 17:49:58 · answer #10 · answered by Spoken Majority 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋