English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-12-18 11:26:22 · 20 answers · asked by beastlover12 2 in Politics & Government Military

i meant enlisted

2007-12-18 11:40:51 · update #1

20 answers

If a person has the education and background to become an officer, go for it. No drill sergeant is gonna say nothing to no officer, right?

Oh yeah - one other thing, as an officer you'll need better grammar than the above. And spelling skills too.

2007-12-19 18:09:57 · answer #1 · answered by Dragoner 4 · 0 0

Personally, I would select the path to become an Army Officer due to the responsibilities, the opportunities, and the challenges that commissioned soldiers have versus non-commissioned soldiers.

I am a college graduate, and I definately had to weigh in the benefits between being an officer and being an enlisted by listening to the information the recruiters had provided and by researching information on my own.

One of the first criteria to becoming an officer requires a College Degree. If you don't have then you pretty much don't have much of a choice but to become an enlisted personel.

But if you do have a degree, hey go officer! Although, if you do choose to become enlisted, let me tell you that there are more sign up bonuses versus the commissioned route unless you have a "critical" or important job occupation... for instance your a doctor.

But in the long run, I truly think the officer route would be more competitively benefitial, especially if you choose to go in the civilian sector. After all, officers have experience in High Levels of Management. Thats what I need and Thats what I selected.

2007-12-18 15:30:01 · answer #2 · answered by Michael 1 · 0 0

Officers are soldiers to, but I am going to guess you mean enlisted.

I prefer being enlisted because that is what I am. Twice the work, half the pay.

If I had the choice I would like to be a Warrant Flight Officer. Those guys have it made.

2007-12-18 11:32:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

If you are comparing an officer against against an NCO then if you had the ability then being an officer must be preferable. Greater income and residual pension rights, better standard of living, more responsibility. The snag is who would want to be a serving soldier, officer or NCO, at a time of financial deprivation, ridiculous conflict and a significant chance that you could killed or mutilated. O, what an awful war.

2007-12-18 21:15:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

u mean enlisted or officer?
Honestly i would go enlisted.......thats AF not army though
you are able to change your afsc, or for the army, MOS
sure you have more power being an officer
but also a LOT more stress Once you get up in rank there is not too much of a difference, most enlistededs have a degree this day and age anyways

2007-12-18 11:47:15 · answer #5 · answered by michelle n 2 · 0 1

Officers are soldiers if they are in the army. We assume you mean officer or enlisted. I don't have the butt kissing, super political powers that are needed to exist in the world of the officer. As a former NCO, that is where I what I would prefer be if I was somehow brought back into the army life.

2007-12-18 11:38:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

interior the army, enlisted workers -- lady and male -- are schooled in a undeniable occupation, and that they are assigned a checklist code referred to as armed forces occupation distinctiveness or MOS. All officials, regardless of their value source, are assigned to a "branch" of the army. those branches start up with the three strive against arms -- Infantry, Armor and field Artillery. each and every branch has a house installation (Infantry - feet. Benning, GA; Armor - feet. Knox, KY; Artillery - feet. Sill, ok) for a sequence of stepped forward training as an officer's occupation advances. there are a number of different branches -- sign, Chemical, Ordnance, Finance, decide propose, scientific, Transportation, armed forces Police, etc. whether, an officer commissioned in any particular branch can request or be assigned to the different branch. moreover, in view that officials are knowledgeable and experienced leaders, they could know all different branches and characteristic the ability to conform to their accountability assignments. So how are you able to certainly say you do unlike "multiple the officer professions" once you fairly don't be attentive to precisely what they are truthfully? as an occasion, an infantry officer might desire to flow airborne and to particular Forces. So can officials of alternative branches. have been given the assumption? there are a number of professions, and you're at the instant too youthful to be attentive to the infinite opportunities accessible to officials. learn!

2016-11-03 23:54:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Officer. You get more pay (not my biggest motivation, but helps) , the chance to lead brave men and women in service to your country, and you learn great skills that will benefit you later in life, although being enlisted will too, just not quite as much

2007-12-18 12:47:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Enlisted... you can guarantee your job (unlike an officer) and always become an officer later if you change your mind.

2007-12-18 12:22:12 · answer #9 · answered by Carrot 5 · 0 0

Everyone in the Army is a soldier, officer or no.

2007-12-18 11:31:18 · answer #10 · answered by DOOM 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers