2007-12-18 06:58:55 · 7 answers · asked by laylazim 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Only in naive little minds who eyes are wide shut.
2007-12-18 07:01:10 · answer #1 · answered by ฉันรักเบ้า 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
"it was a sign of the dufus in the white house."-dynastyman1
Hahaha, what a moron...
The Gulf War referrs to the war in 1990/1991 Not the War in Iraq.
Your response betrays your intellegence level.
2007-12-18 15:06:54 · answer #2 · answered by matt m 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well, no.
Is seeing signs of the New World Order a sign of a mental disorder?
2007-12-18 15:06:36 · answer #3 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It was a sign of a changing political environment. For starters both the US, and the USSR before it broke up condemned Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. Secondly Saddam had been one of our allies, in the 1980's. Now he was a sworn enemy. Further Muslim nations allowed western troops in to their nations to attack fellow Muslims.
2007-12-18 15:08:07 · answer #4 · answered by satcomgrunt 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What is this "New World Order" you people keep talking about? I see no difference between the jackassery that went on 50 years ago and the jackassery that goes on today.
2007-12-18 15:04:14 · answer #5 · answered by Freethinker 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Nothing new about Oil & Power
2007-12-18 15:02:37 · answer #6 · answered by Dougal 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Is your question a sign of stupidity in front of a keyboard??
2007-12-18 17:20:53 · answer #7 · answered by conranger1 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋