Which one would you allow to remain, and why?
2007-12-18 06:54:52 · 27 answers · asked by frenzy-CIB- Jim's with Jesus 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yoga is not a God-believing faith.
2007-12-18 07:01:28 · update #1
Poppy, sweetie, I just looked it up. Buddhist believe that God is a man-made creation.
2007-12-18 07:04:52 · update #2
Buddhism is not a God-believing faith, people.
2007-12-18 07:07:02 · update #3
I wouldn't eliminate any, that would make me no worse than the people who try to do the same thing. I think people should have a right to believe in a god if they want.
A lot of people are saying Buddhism, which isn't a theistic belief system.
2007-12-18 07:07:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Buddhism
2007-12-18 14:59:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Belief in the Greek gods.
Because there are not many believers in that any more.
In reality this is a silly question.
If I could poof all religions into non-existence then I would be godlike - I guess I would be left with the religion of SimonT!
If I have a valid logical argument that will actually persuade believers, then I would suspect that it would apply to all religions. If I do not have that argument then I will not be able to eliminate any religion.
So, as I see it, it is a all-or-nothing proposition.
2007-12-18 15:09:54 · answer #3 · answered by Simon T 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I agree with Mr. Samsa... Mormons. They are nice! Once I was sick at home and they came to my door, I told them I wasn't feeling well and they asked if there was anything they could do for me (house, yard work, whatever). I told them no but I have no doubts that they would have done whatever I asked!
BTW, some of you, Buddhism isn't a God-believing faith.
2007-12-18 15:01:27 · answer #4 · answered by Gen•X•er (I love zombies!) 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Buddhism. It's not god beliving but it has all the good aspects of it of most religions without the deity to scare you into doing something. You do good for the sake of furthering yourself. It promotes progression, not stagnation and regression, like most religions [i.e. just say you believe in Jayzus and force your beliefs down others throats, and you will be saved. It has been like this for thousands of years. That's stagnanting.]
Basically, you do good for the sake of it, and you behave well for the sake of it, not because some all powerful deity threatens you with eternal damnation.
2007-12-18 15:02:58 · answer #5 · answered by Alex 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
2007-12-18 15:06:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't have a problem with religions in general. It's the fanatical followers that I have a problem with. But if I had to keep any one of them, it would be the Buddhists, but they don't follow a god.
2007-12-18 14:59:18 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Which one doesn't want to impose its beliefs on others? Seriously, any religion that teaches if someone doesn't want to believe leave them alone is fine with me. Oh I almost forgot AND the followers actually follow that teaching...
2007-12-18 14:58:28 · answer #8 · answered by tuyet n 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
If I could but didn't have to, I wouldn't eliminate any of the faiths.
Otherwise, does "non-fundamentalism" count as a faith?
2007-12-18 14:59:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yoga, because it provides a means for actual experience rather than mere dogma.
2007-12-18 14:59:05 · answer #10 · answered by neil s 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋