what argument do you global warming believers have for this?

Question

http://www.iceagenow.com/New_Study_Explodes_Human_Global_Warming_Story.htm

Answer 1

While it is a known fact that Hansen has knowingly used false data to "prove" his theory, Singer is vilified for his tobacco findings and working for oil companies. While Hansen is favoured by the political Left with money and academics and applauded for his findings, the Left sneers at Singer because he works for industry. The Left despises smoking, so anything that shows smoking to not be as bad as they want must be the result of bad science by a bad scientist. Any work by this scientist must then be rejected because he is a bad person, even if his science is right.

Get off it people, Climate Change is natural and we can't stop it, we can only do our best to clean up and use energy better so it costs us less. Computers are only as good as the data and programs in them and judging from most computers there are more variables in weather than they can handle yet. What they are getting is the best guess. They can't even predict weather 2 days in advance much less for years.

Answer 2

Their only argument is that "Realclimate.org says"...... or "James Hansen says".......... Now they will refute the validity of the people in this article. But they will continue to back up the "high and mighty" Hansen by calling him "Dr" all of the time, while stating the scientists in this article are not worthy of the title of "Dr". Hansen is compeletly biased in this matter, and this is not unjustifiable smear because he has been preaching this notion for about two decades. Around the same time he began to speak with Gore more frequently. Maybe Hansen will get some of the kickbacks from GIM?

Answer 3

Start wining money with the Zcodes System from here https://tr.im/kVyeA .
Zcodes System is a simple yet effective system. Forget about guesswork or depending purely on a very fickle woman Luck. You obtain precisely the thing you need and are shown precisely that which you have to do to be able to win consistently
In the event that you use Zcodes System you are supplied with detailed video tutorials and tutorials to exhibit you precisely how the device operates and what you need to complete in order to produce money.
Zcodes System is good for novices to because even although you know practically nothing about sports once you join, you will learn all you need to know fast and effectively and you will particularly learn how to increase your paying to reap the greatest winning rewards.

Answer 4

If you want to learn how you can power it to maximize your activities betting winnings then this system is for you personally https://tr.im/h1Rnb because Zcodes System is about this.
Zcodes System may be the title of a sports betting process that's endured, in a few form or another, since 1999. Zcodes System is an advanced statistically based system that's damaged the “code” of how activities games may perform out.
Zcodes System is your best ally in sport betting.

Answer 5

I don't agree with that realclimate article. Their reasoning is that the satelite data should agree with the model data within 2 standard deviations of the model run.

The model runs would vary a lot from one run to the next, but when you average them out, you get a time averaged model of the climate. The satelite data is time averaged too, so if the model were accurate, it should be close to the satelite data.

Answer 6

Christy is one of the few people on the planet involved in attempting to model climate with computer simulations, his position on the subject is the most realistic of any climatologists that I have read about. His main contention is that we do not know enough to model climate yet. I agree with that philosophy, I have been modeling seismic waves through the Earths surface for two decades now. And I am utilizing mathematical principles and software concepts that been under constant development for 50 years, and we still do not know enough. Climate science is just theoretical research, it has a long way to go.

Answer 7

I discuss this paper here:

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=As6MMc8lLk5ZrMSOAhywS77ty6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071217145149AAgXfTz

RealClimate (a site run by climate scientists) analyzes the paper and troposphere temperature measurements and concludes:

"This...is a demonstration that there is no clear model-data discrepancy in tropical tropospheric trends once you take the systematic uncertainties in data and models seriously. Funnily enough, this is exactly the conclusion reached by a much better paper by P. Thorne and colleagues. Douglass et al's claim to the contrary is simply unsupportable."

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/12/tropical-troposphere-trends/

Basically to sum it up, the authors (Singer, Christy, Douglass, et al) treat the temperature data as if it's more accurate than it really is. If you take the uncertainties into account (there are biases in satellite and ballon atmospheric temperature measurements which need to be accounted for), there is no discrepancy between the models and data.

I don't know if the authors are being intentionally deceptive or if they really think the data is better than it is. Considering that one of the authors is Singer - who has also claimed that smoking doesn't cause cancer while being funded by tobacco companies and is currently funded by several oil copmanies including ExxonMobile - I wouldn't be surprised if there were some purposefully deception involved.

Answer 8

The practice of using computer modeling to predict climate patterns is fundamentally flawed. Whether those models predict GW or cooling. The nature of the flaw is that we do not know enough about all of the variables, that effect climate, to garner an accurate prediction. Anyone who claims to know otherwise is trying to sell something.
Unfortunately there are plenty of "buyers".

Answer 9

don't believe everything you read on the internet.

i would seggest looking into the sientific and enviromental aspects of global warming if you are so bothered.

personally i don't believe much of the hype, as global warming and cooling has been going on since the beginging of the earth, i think it is out of our control and what we do is insegnificant. however the now 'green boom' supports many peoples jobs, and is pushing companies to think smarter about how they do things, from the fuel efficiency of a car(good for my pocket) and making better use of materials to avoid having to pay to recycle their leftovers.

Answer 10

A bunch of people paid by the oil and tobacco industries to refute global warming and the dangers of smoking led by Professer Fred Singer - a man with substantial interests in both oil and tobacco who is funded by R J Reynolds and ExxonMobil and has established organisations funded by Exxon, Chevron, Western Fuels Alliance etc.

Must be accurate in that case.