Why do you think the church left the book of Mary out of the bible?

Answer 1

It would have ruined the overall misogynistic theme.

Answer 2

properly certainly many books have been omitted. particularly, there became no such element as a 'bible' in early Christianity, a minimum of no longer an expert Bible; yet there have been favored texts- and an extremely extensive form of them used among distinctive sects. because it became, Constantine became the actual rigidity in the back of uniting Christianity as a uniformed or cooperating identity- and subsequently especially, the 'bible' became standardized. And mutually as the addition and removing of books persisted even centuries later, a minimum of there became an 'expert' dedication to have a single bible. Many scholars might say that this became achieved for political reasons quite than non secular ones. somewhat if it became non secular- then the 1st attention might settle for to those people who have been maximum knowledgeable of the writers. people who may be disciples, scribes of the disciples, or maybe their scholars. because it is, the 1st 4 canons (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) are all formally declared nameless. And this they'll instruct you even in the seminaries. mutually as there is a lot conjecture and guesswork at who might or won't be the authors, in component of actuality that those are basically guesses- yet no longer somewhat information. Even the e book of Hebrews have not have been given any prevalent author. If there is no prevalent author, then there is particularly no thank you to tell how knowledgeable the guy is or isn't with reference to the project he speaks. as a remember of actuality, maximum bible scholars of at present have self belief that 2 Peter is a fabricated or pseudononymous text cloth: meaning the author claimed to be Peter, yet particularly isn't Peter. In easy of this then, understanding that many texts may be organic guesswork or maybe fabrications; and in the sunshine of ambiguity, and the anonymity that accompanies the anomaly, you will basically end that the books weren't chosen based on the certainty in them because it became basically impossible to confirm the certainty of it in the absence of a confirmed authorship. Analogy might propose then, that the books have been chosen the two for political reasons, or to examine the non-public theologies held by some. As i'm hoping you're conscious that the Catholics, the Jehovah Witness, the Protestant and the Coptics all have their own distinctive bibles. perhaps this supply you some reasonable perception into the project.

Answer 3

It's obvious that the early church had a need to subjugate women as a whole. And as such they could not very well have Mary with writings in the bible even though it seems she was a very important part.

Answer 4

The Bible was edited by men.......

And the simple Truth is...that the conception and birth of JESUS was between God and Mary, ( a woman)...
there was no man involved...none...
Man had NOTHING to do with the prophesy of his birth...
so early Christian man in his jealousy, in his belief that women were property, chattel....did everything in his power to obliterate good Women...Like Mary from the Biblical text

Answer 5

Haven't read it but I can only presume for the same reasons that they left all the others out - it didn't follow the line of brainwashing that they preferred and possibly disagreed/conflicted with other accounts.

Answer 6

They were saving it to use it in the sequel, The Revenge of God, or B2. I here they have locked in Bruce Willis to play God.

Answer 7

we have tertullian's testimony that the acts of thekla were omitted from the biblical canon because the idea of a woman performing the lord's ministry was considered dangerous to the early church.

the gospel of mary magdalene would have been even worse.

Answer 8

Perhaps they were embarrassed that she had a child out of wedlock .... ?

Just guessing, although after the "Technicolor Dreamcoat" incident, I clearly have all of my "facts" messed up ....

(oops) :)

Answer 9

I did not know there was such a book but imagin it was not written in a way that made sence.

Answer 10

because there is no such thing as the book of Mary, it is an invention