Suppose the judge and jurors are Christians and the accused is Buddhist or Muslim. Forget Buddhist, he is Muslim. Can they really go against their inclination to be biased against the accused. After all, nobody is watching the prejudice in their mind.
2007-12-04 20:25:04 · 7 answers · asked by mozart8 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Asolutely Not.
Parliament, the law making body, Executive, the body which executes the law of the country and Judiciary, the controlling authority which checks whether the acts done are in conformity with the laws.
The citizens of a country has to abide by the laws of the country and judiciary has the upper hand; not the other way round.
Law does not have any religion, caste or creed. The judiciary is concerned about the legality of the proposed case ad judgement can be and must be based on the basis of the evidences put forward before the jury.
Moreover the onus to prove is on the part of the person who accuses on another that he has been subjected to injustice, unquestionably.
Prejudices of the jury are questionable at higher level of courts by appeal.
2007-12-05 00:23:18 · answer #1 · answered by iknev n 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes some are biased when it come to ppls faiths just like some ppl are biased towards the colors of some ppl skins or the shape of someones eyes,.....theres always gonna be biased ppl
2007-12-04 20:34:09 · answer #2 · answered by Feda So Sweet 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in line with possibility it incredibly is because of the fact we've heard some issues one too many cases: a million. you are going to burn in hell. 2. Why do you hate god? 3. you recognize you somewhat do have faith in god, so why not admit it? 4. devil is in you, or you may carry on with Jesus. 5. Atheists are to not be depended on. 6. i think sorry for you which you do not have the "reality." want i bypass on? only study the style of issues some theists write in R&S. Atheists ought to handle that form of crap each and every of the time, not purely in Yahoo! solutions. Atheists are informed that in the event that they do unlike what christians are asserting they ought to only shop it to themselves. incredibly? How very honest that would not sound. There are christians who're revising the history of our u . s . a . to make it seem that it replaced into based with purely them in suggestions. ought to atheists turn a blind eye to this, and only close up? some christians elect their religious mottos throughout our secular u . s . a .'s money and homes. ought to atheists only overlook with regards to the form, and our rights? If lifelike christians do not elect to be lumped in with the crazies, then in line with possibility they ought to handle them, only as lifelike muslims ought to handle their fringe element.
2016-12-10 13:09:29 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course.. Try being on trial in Utah and not be a Mormon. You will go straight to prison.
Edit: hmm, where are my Mormon friends who always give me the thumbs down anytime I say anything about the LDS.
2007-12-04 20:28:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that would depend on the nature of their faith.
2007-12-04 20:34:04 · answer #5 · answered by sympleesymple 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they are not supposed to but I think we all know it has to be a factor.
2007-12-04 20:30:20 · answer #6 · answered by dallas 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think most can be objective.
At least, I HOPE most can....
2007-12-04 20:28:45 · answer #7 · answered by Quaoar Rocks! 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋